ArticleUpsala journal of medical sciences2016
Advancing preconception health in the United States: strategies for change.
Article in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of an Interconception Intervention Provided by Public Health Nurses.Maternal and child health journal · 2020Trial
- Can Reproductive Life Plan-based counselling increase men's fertility awareness?Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2018Trial
- Organisation, Financing, and Implementation of Preconception Care in Primary Care: Implications for Women's Health and Well-Being.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Perceived need of information and education about conception preparedness (CP) among engaged and soon to be married couples: a qualitative survey.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Looking Back, Visioning Forward: Preconception Health in the US 2005 to 2023.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- Conception and fertility: A survey examining the practices, attitudes, and knowledge of reproductive-age Greek women.European journal of midwifery · 2025Article
- Perinatal interventions to prevent Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): A scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- Preconception Care: A Strategic Intervention for the Prevention of Neonatal and Birth Disorders.Cureus · 2023Review
- Preconception Counseling: Identifying Ways to Improve Services.AJP reports · 2022Article
- Failures in reproductive health policy: overcoming the consequences and causes of inaction.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Preparation for fatherhood: A survey of men's preconception health knowledge and behaviour in England.PloS one · 2019Article
- Addressing Intimate Partner Violence to Improve Women's Preconception Health.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2018Article
- Development of an evidence-based website on preconception health.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2018Article
- Making the Case: The Importance of Using 10 Key Preconception Indicators in Understanding the Health of Women of Reproductive Age.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In January 2015, the US Preconception Health and Health Care Initiative (PCHHC) established a new national vision that all women and men of reproductive age will achieve optimal health and wellness, fostering a healthy life course for them and any children they may have. Achieving this vision presents both challenges and opportunities. This manuscript describes the reasons why the US needs to prioritize preconception health as well as its efforts historically to advance change. The authors share lessons from past work and current strategies in the US to reach this ambitious goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.