Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27646508›Full record

Trial reportClinical trials (London, England)2017

The design and conduct of Keep It Off: An online randomized trial of financial incentives for weight-loss maintenance.

Pamela A Shaw, William S Yancy, Lisa Wesby, Victoria Ulrich, Andrea B Troxel, David Huffman, Gary D Foster, Kevin Volpp

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical trials (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03834194 (Effect of Incentives for Self-weighing, Weight Management Goals and Physical Activity Goals on Gaining Weight Healthily During Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03834194 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Incentives for Self-weighing, Weight Management Goals and Physical Activity Goals on Gaining Weight Healthily During Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TennesseeRan2019 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsGestational Weight GainArmsLottery + Monthly Weight, Lottery + Overall Weight + Exercise, Lottery + Overall Weight, Loss + Overall Weight, Loss + Overall Weight + Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pamela A Shaw1 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
William S Yancy4 Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Lisa Wesby2 Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Victoria Ulrich2 Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrea B Troxel1 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David Huffman2 Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gary D Foster7 Department of Science and Innovation, Weight Watchers International, New York, NY, USA.
Kevin Volpp2 Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

The Penn Roybal Center on Behavioral Economics and Health: Solving for Scale and Impact with Design Thinking, Digital Platforms, and Dynamic AdaptationP30AG034546 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Alison Meredith Buttenheim · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
A randomized trial of financial incentives for maintenance of weight lossR01AG045045 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VOLPP, KEVIN G · 2012 to 2017
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034546NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Obesity continues to be a serious public health challenge. Rates are increasing worldwide, with nearly 70% of the US adults overweight or obese, leading to increased clinical and economic burden. While successful approaches for achieving weight loss have been identified, techniques for long-term maintenance of initial weight loss have largely been unsuccessful. Financial incentive interventions have been shown in several settings to be successful in motivating participants to adopt healthy behaviors. Purpose Keep It Off is a three-arm randomized controlled trial that compares the efficacy of a lottery-based incentive, traditional direct payment incentive, and control of daily feedback without any incentive for weight-loss maintenance. This design allows comparison of a traditional direct payment incentive with one based on behavioral economic principles that consider the underlying psychology of decision-making. Methods Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio for each active arm relative to control, with a targeted 188 participants in total. Eligible participants were those aged 30-80 who lost at least 11 lb (5 kg) during the first 4 months of participation in Weight Watchers, a national weight-loss program, with whom we partnered. The interventions lasted 6 months (Phase I); participants were followed for an additional 6 months without intervention (Phase II). The primary outcome is weight change from baseline to the end of Phase I, with the change at the end of Phase II a key secondary endpoint. Keep It Off is a pragmatic trial that recruited, consented, enrolled, and followed patients electronically. Participants were provided a wireless weight scale that electronically transmitted daily self-monitored weights. Weights were verified every 3 months at a Weight Watchers center local to the participant and electronically transmitted. Results Using the study web-based platform, we integrated recruitment, enrollment, and follow-up procedures into a digital platform that required little staff effort to implement and manage. We randomized 191 participants in less than 1 year. We describe the design of Keep It Off and implementation of enrollment. Lessons Learned We demonstrated that our pragmatic design was successful in rapid accrual of participants in a trial of interventions to maintain weight loss. Limitations Despite the nationwide reach of Weight Watchers, the generalizability of study findings may be limited by the characteristics of its members. The interventions under study are appropriate for settings where an entity, such as an employer or health insurance company, could offer them as a benefit. Conclusions Keep It Off was implemented and conducted with minimal staff effort. This study has the potential to identify a practical and effective weight-loss maintenance strategy.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth BehaviorMotivationWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEconomics, BehavioralFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityWeight LossBehavioral economicsfinancial incentiveobesitypragmatic trialrandomized trialweight-loss maintenance

Identifiers

PMID27646508
PMCPMC5300940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.