ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2016
Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers.
Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leadership, management, and team practices in research labs: Development and validation of two new measures.Accountability in research · 2025Article
- Evaluating and supporting leadership, management, and mentoring: a framework for catalyzing responsible research and healthy research environments.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Review
- Ethical decision-making and role conflict in managing a scientific laboratory.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- Scientific priorities and relational dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- The Global Andrology Forum (GAF): Structure, Roles, Functioning and Outcomes: An Online Model for Collaborative Research.The world journal of men's health · 2024Article
- For the "good of the lab": Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group.Accountability in research · 2023Article
- Research Integrity Supervision Practices and Institutional Support: A Qualitative Study.Journal of academic ethics · 2022Article
- Developing and evaluating a team development intervention to support interdisciplinary teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Leading the people and leading the work: Practical considerations for ethical research.Translational issues in psychological science · 2020Article
- Enhancing reproducibility using interprofessional team best practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Leading for research excellence and integrity: A qualitative investigation of the relationship-building practices of exemplary principal investigators.Accountability in research · 2019Article
- Leadership for Innovation in Healthcare: An Exploration.International journal of health policy and management · 2019Article
- Article
- Cultivating the Human Dimension in Research.Molecular cell · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Principal investigators are responsible for a myriad of leadership and management activities in their work. The practices they use to navigate these responsibilities ultimately influence the quality and integrity of research. However, leadership and management roles in research have received scant empirical examination. Semi-structured interviews with 32 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded genetic researchers revealed that they considered leadership and management essential for effective research, but their scientific training inadequately prepared them. We also report management practices that the researchers described using in their labs, as well as their perceptions of a proposed intervention to enhance laboratory leadership. These findings suggest best practices for the research community, future directions for scientific training, and implications for research on leadership and management in science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.