Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27646291›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2017

Rodent models of obsessive compulsive disorder: Evaluating validity to interpret emerging neurobiology.

Isaac Zike, Tim Xu, Natalie Hong, Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Body Focused Repetitive Behavior Disorders: Behavioral Models and Neurobiological Mechanisms.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. (ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2020
    Article
  13. Behavioral and synaptic alterations relevant to obsessive-compulsive disorder in mice with increased EAAT3 expression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Isaac ZikeDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: isaac.zike@vanderbilt.edu.
Tim XuJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: tim.xu@jhmi.edu.
Natalie HongCenter for Autism and the Developing Brain, New York Presbyterian Hospital and Cornell University Medical College, White Plains, NY 10605, USA. Electronic address: nah2026@med.cornell.edu.
Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeeleCenter for Autism and the Developing Brain, New York Presbyterian Hospital and Cornell University Medical College, White Plains, NY 10605, USA; Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: veenstr@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Center for Autism and Related Disorders · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Translating OCD gene-association studies into mice to examine SLC1A1 functionR21MH096200 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AHMARI, SUSANNE ELIZABETH, VEENSTRA-VANDERWEELE, JEREMY · 2012 to 2013
$419k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH096200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a common neuropsychiatric disorder with unknown molecular underpinnings. Identification of genetic and non-genetic risk factors has largely been elusive, primarily because of a lack of power. In contrast, neuroimaging has consistently implicated the cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuits in OCD. Pharmacological treatment studies also show specificity, with consistent response of OCD symptoms to chronic treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors; although most patients are left with residual impairment. In theory, animal models could provide a bridge from the neuroimaging and pharmacology data to an understanding of pathophysiology at the cellular and molecular level. Several mouse models have been proposed using genetic, immunological, pharmacological, and optogenetic tools. These experimental model systems allow testing of hypotheses about the origins of compulsive behavior. Several models have generated behavior that appears compulsive-like, particularly excessive grooming, and some have demonstrated response to chronic serotonin reuptake inhibitors, establishing both face validity and predictive validity. Construct validity is more difficult to establish in the context of a limited understanding of OCD risk factors. Our current models may help us to dissect the circuits and molecular pathways that can elicit OCD-relevant behavior in rodents. We can hope that this growing understanding, coupled with developing technology, will prepare us when robust OCD risk factors are better understood.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrainHumansObsessive-Compulsive DisorderReproducibility of ResultsRodentiaautismautoimmunebasal gangliaoptogeneticrepetitive behaviorstriatum

Identifiers

PMID27646291
PMCPMC5458638
OpenAlexW2519891351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.