Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27645786›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2016

Pharmacovigilance of Miltefosine in Treatment of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Areas of Bihar, India.

Krishna Pandey, Vidyanand Ravidas, Niyamat A Siddiqui, Sanjay K Sinha, Rakesh B Verma, Tripurari P Singh, A C Dhariwal, R K Das Gupta, Pradeep Das

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Krishna PandeyRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, Patna, India.
Vidyanand RavidasRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, Patna, India.
Niyamat A SiddiquiRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, Patna, India.
Sanjay K SinhaRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, Patna, India.
Rakesh B VermaRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, Patna, India.
Tripurari P SinghSadar Hospital, East Champaran, Bihar, India.
A C DhariwalDirectorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), Delhi, India.
R K Das GuptaDirectorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), Delhi, India.
Pradeep DasRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, Patna, India. drpradeep.das@gmail.com.
Indian Council of Medical Research · INRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences · INNational Center for Disease Control · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miltefosine, the only oral drug for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), is being used as the first-line drug under the VL elimination program in the Indian subcontinent. Miltefosine is an oral drug which was used as a topical application for skin metastasis of breast cancer. It was found to be effective against Leishmania donovani The main adverse events (AE) reported previously with miltefosine use includes diarrhea, vomiting, and dehydration. Other AEs include, raised serum alanine transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase and renal parameters such as creatinine. In this study, we report AEs in a large patient cohort of VL treated with miltefosine. The purpose of this pharmacovigilance study was to assess adverse drug reactions (ADRs)/AE of miltefosine treatment under unrestricted condition in the field setup. Patients were followed up to 6 months for therapeutic effectiveness. Outcomes of a larger data set of patients treated with this regimen from April 2012 to March 2015 were recorded. In the present study, 646 patients of VL were given miltefosine. Majority of the study subjects (58%) were male. Relapse occurred in 7% during follow-up period. Main causes of death were VL-pulmonary tuberculosis coinfection, extreme diarrhea, and acute pancreatitis which were reported in 1.7% subjects. Of 553 (85.6%) patients completing full course of treatment, 463 (83.7%) showed ADR with miltefosine during the study period. About 2.3% were suffering severe ADR, 51% from moderate, and the rest had mild ADR. The initial and final cure rate was 97.4% and 85.6%, respectively.

Indexed as

PharmacovigilanceAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedAlanine TransaminaseAntiprotozoal AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesChildCohort StudiesCoinfectionDiarrheaDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansAlanine TransaminaseAntiprotozoal AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesmiltefosinePhosphorylcholine

Identifiers

PMID27645786
PMCPMC5094224
OpenAlexW2522425610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.