Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27645465›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The effect of chiropractic treatment on the reaction and response times of special operation forces military personnel: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

James W DeVocht, Dean L Smith, Cynthia R Long, Lance Corber, Bridget Kane, Thomas M Jones, Christine M Goertz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02168153 (Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment Using Reaction and Response Times in Members of the Special Operation Forces), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02168153 nacompletednot on this map

Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment Using Reaction and Response Times in Members of the Special Operation Forces (ACT2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2014 to 2016Enrolled120ConditionsPhysiological Measurements of Response and Reaction TimesArmsChiropractic Manipulative Therapy, Wait-list
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James W DeVochtPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady St, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA. devocht_j@palmer.edu.
Dean L SmithDepartment of Kinesiology and Health, 26E Phillips Hall, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA.
Cynthia R LongPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady St, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
Lance CorberPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady St, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
Bridget KanePalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady St, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
Thomas M JonesChiropractic Clinic, Blanchfield Army Community Hospital, 650 Joel Drive, Fort Campbell, KY, 42223-5349, USA.
Christine M GoertzPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady St, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
Palmer College of Chiropractic · USBlanchfield Army Community Hospital · USMiami University · US

Funding

RENOVATION OF PALMER CENTER FOR CHIROPRACTIC RESEARCHC06RR015433 · NCRR · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI MEEKER, WILLIAM C · 2000 to 2000
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChiropractic care is commonly used to treat musculoskeletal conditions and has been endorsed by clinical practice guidelines as being evidence-based and cost-effective for the treatment of patients with low back pain. Gaps in the literature exist regarding the physiological outcomes of chiropractic treatment. Previous pilot work has indicated the possibility of improvements in response time following the application of chiropractic treatment. However, it is unknown whether or not chiropractic treatment is able to improve reaction and response times in specific populations of interest. One such population is the U.S. military special operation forces' (SOF) personnel.

methodsThis study is a randomized controlled trial of 120 asymptomatic volunteer SOF personnel. All participants are examined by a study doctor of chiropractic (DC) for eligibility prior to randomization. The participants are randomly allocated to either a treatment group receiving four treatments of chiropractic manipulative therapy (CMT) over 2 weeks or to a wait-list control group. The wait-list group does not receive any treatment but has assessments at the same time interval as the treatment group. The outcome measures are simple reaction times for dominant hand and dominant foot, choice reaction time with prompts calling for either hand or either foot, response time using Fitts' law tasks for small movements involving eye-hand coordination, and brief whole body movements using the t-wall, a commercially available product. At the first visit, all five tests are completed so that participants can familiarize themselves with the equipment and protocol. Assessments at the second and the final visits are used for data analysis. DISCUSSION: SOF personnel are highly motivated and extremely physically fit individuals whose occupation requires reaction times that are as quick as possible during the course of their assigned duties. A goal of CMT is to maximize the functionality and integration of the neuromusculoskeletal systems. Therefore, chiropractic treatment may be able to optimize the capacity of the numerous components of those systems, resulting in improved reaction time. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that CMT improves reaction and response times in asymptomatic SOF personnel.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02168153 . Registered on 12 June 2014.

Indexed as

Military MedicineMilitary PersonnelReaction TimeAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaChoice BehaviorClinical ProtocolsFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansKentuckyLow Back PainMaleManipulation, ChiropracticMiddle AgedPain MeasurementBiomechanical assessmentsChiropractic manipulative therapyReaction timesResponse timesSpecial forces

Identifiers

PMID27645465
PMCPMC5029007
OpenAlexW2522531882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.