Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27644695›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Reducing repeat pregnancies in adolescence: applying realist principles as part of a mixed-methods systematic review to explore what works, for whom, how and under what circumstances.

Joanna M Charles, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Rabeea'h Aslam, Maggie Hendry, Diana Pasterfield, Rhiannon Whitaker

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna M CharlesCentre for Health Economics & Medicines Evaluation, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK. j.charles@bangor.ac.uk.
Jo Rycroft-MaloneSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Fron Heulog, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2EF, UK.
Rabeea'h AslamLiverpool Review and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
Maggie HendryNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Gwenfro Units 4-8, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, UK.
Diana PasterfieldNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Gwenfro Units 4-8, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, UK.
Rhiannon WhitakerWhitaker Research Ltd. Cae Ffos, Treborth Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2RJ, UK.
Bangor University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/141/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research has demonstrated emotional, psychological and educational harm to young mothers following unintended conceptions. The UK has one of the highest rates of pregnancies in adolescence in Western Europe with a high proportion of these being repeat pregnancies, making it a topic of interest for public health policy makers, and health and social care practitioners. As part of a wider mixed-methods systematic review, realist principles were applied to synthesise evidence about interventions aiming to reduce repeat pregnancies in adolescence.

methodsA multi-streamed, mixed-methods systematic review was conducted searching 11 major electronic databases and 9 additional databases from 1995 onwards, using key terms such as pregnancy, teen or adolescent. The principles of realist synthesis were applied to all included literature to uncover theories about what works, for whom, how and in what context. Initial theory areas were developed through evidence scoping, group discussion by the authors and stakeholder engagement to uncover context + mechanism = outcome (CMO) configurations and related narratives.

resultsThe searches identified 8,664 documents initially, and 403 in repeat searches, filtering to 81 included studies, including qualitative studies, randomised controlled trials, quantitative studies and grey literature. Three CMO configurations were developed. The individual experiences of young mothers' triggered self-efficacy, notions of perceived risks, susceptibility and benefits of pregnancy, resulting in the adolescent taking control of their fertility and sexual encounters. The choice between motherhood and other goals triggered notions of motivations, resulting in the adolescent managing their expectations of motherhood and controlling their fertility and sexual encounters. Barriers and facilitators to accessing services triggered notions of connectedness and self-determination; resulting in interventions that are tailored so they are relevant to young persons, and improve access to services and engagement with the issue of pregnancy in adolescence.

conclusionsPregnancy in adolescence is a complex issue with many factors to consider. The conceptual platform described here could help guide policy makers and professionals towards a number of areas that need to be attended to in order to increase the likelihood of an intervention working to prevent rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescence.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42012003168.

Indexed as

AdolescentBirth IntervalsFemaleHumansMothersMotivationPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescencePregnancy, UnplannedQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSexual BehaviorAdolescentMixed-methods systematic reviewPregnancyRealist synthesisTeen

Identifiers

PMID27644695
PMCPMC5029024
OpenAlexW2521577585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.