Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27644591›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2016

Association of Dry Eye Tests With Extraocular Signs Among 3514 Participants in the Sjögren's Syndrome International Registry.

Vatinee Y Bunya, Satasuk Joy Bhosai, Ana Maria Heidenreich, Kazuko Kitagawa, Genevieve B Larkin, Thomas M Lietman, Bruce D Gaynor, Esen K Akpek, Mina Massaro-Giordano, M Srinivasan and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Update on Sjögren Syndrome and Other Causes of Sicca in Older Adults.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Vatinee Y BunyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: vatinee.bunya@uphs.upenn.edu.
Satasuk Joy BhosaiDepartment of Ophthalmology and F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ana Maria HeidenreichDepartment of Ophthalmology, German Hospital and University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Kazuko KitagawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Genevieve B LarkinDepartment of Ophthalmology, King's College Hospital, London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas M LietmanDepartment of Ophthalmology and F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Bruce D GaynorDepartment of Ophthalmology and F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Esen K AkpekWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mina Massaro-GiordanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
M SrinivasanAravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Travis C PorcoDepartment of Ophthalmology and F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
John P WhitcherDepartment of Ophthalmology and F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Stephen C ShiboskiDivision of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Lindsey A CriswellRosalind Russell/Ephraim P. Engleman Rheumatology Research Center, Departments of Medicine and Orofacial Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Caroline H ShiboskiDepartment of Orofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) Study Group
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USAravind Eye Hospital · INJohns Hopkins University · USKanazawa Medical University · JPKing's College Hospital · GBUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

PENN Vision Clinical Scientist ProgramK12EY015398 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JOSHUA L DUNAIEF · 2004 to 2026
$11.7M
INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH REGISTRY NETWORK FOR SJOGERNS SYNDROME-268032636N01DE032636 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GREENSPAN, JOHN · 2005 to 2006
–
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY015398NIDCR NIH HHS N01 DE032636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify a screening strategy for dry eye patients with a high likelihood of having Sjogren syndrome (SS) through the evaluation of the association of ocular surface tests with the extraocular signs used for the diagnosis of SS.

designMulticenter cross-sectional study.

methodsThe Sjogren's International Clinical Collaborative Alliance (SICCA) registry enrolled 3514 participants with SS or possible SS from 9 international academic sites. Ocular surface evaluation included Schirmer I testing, tear breakup time (TBUT), and staining of the cornea (0-6 points) and conjunctiva (0-6 points). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for (1) histopathologic changes on labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsies (positive = focus score of ≥1 focus/4 mm

resultsThe adjusted odds of having a positive LSG biopsy were significantly higher among those with an abnormal Schirmer I test (adjusted OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.05-1.51, P = .014) and positive conjunctival staining (for each additional unit of staining 1.46; 95% CI 1.39-1.53, P < .001) or corneal staining (for each additional unit of staining 1.14; 95% CI 1.08-1.21, P < .001). The odds of having a positive serology were significantly higher among those with an abnormal Schirmer I test (adjusted OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.09-1.54, P = .004) and conjunctival staining (adjusted OR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.43-1.58, P < .001).

conclusionsIn addition to corneal staining, which was associated with a higher likelihood of having a positive LSG biopsy, conjunctival staining and abnormal Schirmer I testing are of critical importance to include when screening dry eye patients for possible SS, as they were associated with a higher likelihood of having a positive LSG biopsy and serology.

Indexed as

RegistriesCross-Sectional StudiesDry Eye SyndromesFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMaleSeverity of Illness IndexSjogren's SyndromeTearsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27644591
PMCPMC5147490
OpenAlexW2520256660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.