Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27644091›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgical oncology2016

Clinical significance of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection in the treatment of clinically node-negative papillary thyroid cancer patients.

Claudio Gambardella, Ernesto Tartaglia, Anna Nunziata, Graziella Izzo, Giuseppe Siciliano, Fabio Cavallo, Claudio Mauriello, Salvatore Napolitano, Guglielmo Thomas, Domenico Testa and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudio GambardellaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Ernesto TartagliaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Anna NunziataDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Graziella IzzoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe SicilianoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Fabio CavalloDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Claudio MaurielloDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore NapolitanoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Guglielmo ThomasDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Domenico TestaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Gianluca RossettiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Alessandro SanguinettiEndocrine Surgical Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Nicola AveniaEndocrine Surgical Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giovanni ConzoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgery and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. giovanni.conzo@unina2.it.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph nodal involvement is very common in differentiated thyroid cancer, and in addition, cervical lymph node micrometastases are observed in up to 80 % of papillary thyroid cancers. During the last decades, the role of routine central lymph node dissection (RCLD) in the treatment of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) has been an object of research, and it is now still controversial. Nevertheless, many scientific societies and referral authors have definitely stated that even if in expert hands, RCLD is not associated to higher morbidity; it should be indicated only in selected cases. MAIN BODY: In order to better analyze the current role of prophylactic neck dissection in the surgical treatment of papillary thyroid cancers, an analysis of the most recent literature data was performed. Prophylactic or therapeutic lymph node dissection, selective, lateral or central lymph node dissection, modified radical neck dissection, and papillary thyroid cancer were used by the authors as keywords performing a PubMed database research. Literature reviews, PTCs large clinical series and the most recent guidelines of different referral endocrine societies, inhering neck dissection for papillary thyroid cancers, were also specifically evaluated. A higher PTC incidence was nowadays reported in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) clinical series. In addition, ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration citology allowed a more precocious diagnosis in the early phases of disease. The role of prophylactic neck dissection in papillary thyroid cancer management remains controversial especially regarding indications, approach, and surgical extension. Even if morbidity rates seem to be similar to those reported after total thyroidectomy alone, RCLD impact on local recurrence and long-term survival is still a matter of research. Nevertheless, only a selective use in high-risk cases is supported by more and more scientific data.

conclusionsIn the last years, higher papillary thyroid cancer incidence and more precocious diagnoses were worldwide reported. Among endocrine and neck surgeons, there is agreement about indications to prophylactic treatment of node-negative "high-risk" patients. A recent trend toward RCLD avoiding radioactive treatment is still debated, but nevertheless, prophylactic dissections in low-risk cases should be avoided. Prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate the benefits of different approaches and allow to drawn definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

ThyroidectomyAge FactorsCarcinomaCarcinoma, PapillaryEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationHumansIncidenceLymphatic MetastasisMorbidityNeck DissectionNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPractice Guidelines as TopicProphylactic Surgical ProceduresProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSex FactorsBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafThyroglobulinPapillary thyroid cancerProphylactic lymph node dissectionRadioactive iodine ablationRoutine central lymph node dissectionTherapeutic lymph node dissectionTotal thyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID27644091
PMCPMC5028971
OpenAlexW2521330084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.