ArticleAnnals of surgery2017
The Future of Basic Science in Academic Surgery: Identifying Barriers to Success for Surgeon-scientists.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed.
- Where Are the Women in Basic Science Research? Gender Trends in Abstracts Presented at the Academic Surgical Congress.The Journal of surgical research · 2026Article
- Navigating physician-scientist careers: insights from American Board of Internal Medicine Research Pathway graduates.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Practice Patterns of Graduates from a Surgical Oncology Fellowship Program.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Grantsmanship Refined: Evaluation and Training of Efficacy in Residents (Greater Study).Journal of surgical education · 2026Article
- Distinct challenges faced by surgeons in conducting and publishing surgical research: implications for training, ethics, and academic surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Review
- How the Jacobson Award Catalyzed My Pursuit of Surgical Innovation.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2026Article
- Impact of Surgeon-Scientist Institutional Transitions on Funding Progression.Annals of surgery · 2025Article
- Where You Train Matters: Surgeon-Scientists Disproportionately Trained at Highly Funded Institutions.Annals of surgery · 2025Article
- Procedural Physician-Scientists as Catalysts for Innovation in Team Science and Clinical Care.Cancers · 2025Article
- The Passion Tax: Valuation Disparity among Academic and Nonacademic Surgery Subspecialty.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2025Article
- NIH funding for the pediatric surgeon-scientist: A stable entity, but for how long?Surgery open science · 2025Article
- Building your research team: Insights on hiring, assembling, and leading research teams.JVS-vascular insights · 2025Article
- NIH funding for the pediatric surgeon-scientist: An analysis of current trends.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- Trends in Specialty Training and National Institutes of Health Funding Among Surgeon-Scientists.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Funding a general surgery residency academic development time program.American journal of surgery · 2024Article
- A Nationwide Evaluation of Cardiothoracic Resident Research Productivity.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Changes in self-confidence in professional, personal, and scientific skills by gender during physician-scientist training at the University of Pittsburgh.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Current status of National Institutes of Health funding for thoracic surgeons in the United States: Beacon of hope or candle in the wind?The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the challenges confronting surgeons performing basic science research in today's academic surgery environment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Multiple studies have identified challenges confronting surgeon-scientists and impacting their ability to be successful. Although these threats have been known for decades, the downward trend in the number of successful surgeon-scientists continues. Clinical demands, funding challenges, and other factors play important roles, but a rigorous analysis of academic surgeons and their experiences regarding these issues has not previously been performed.
methodsAn online survey was distributed to 2504 members of the Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons to determine factors impacting success. Survey results were subjected to statistical analyses. We also reviewed publicly available data regarding funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
resultsNIH data revealed a 27% decline in the proportion of NIH funding to surgical departments relative to total NIH funding from 2007 to 2014. A total of 1033 (41%) members responded to our survey, making this the largest survey of academic surgeons to date. Surgeons most often cited the following factors as major impediments to pursuing basic investigation: pressure to be clinically productive, excessive administrative responsibilities, difficulty obtaining extramural funding, and desire for work-life balance. Surprisingly, a majority (68%) did not believe surgeons can be successful basic scientists in today's environment, including departmental leadership.
conclusionsWe have identified important barriers that confront academic surgeons pursuing basic research and a perception that success in basic science may no longer be achievable. These barriers need to be addressed to ensure the continued development of future surgeon-scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.