ArticleFrontiers in environmental science2016
Predictive Modeling of Estrogen Receptor Binding Agents Using Advanced Cheminformatics Tools and Massive Public Data.
Article in Frontiers in environmental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- UV/Chlorine Treatment of Sulfamethoxazole: Removal, Transformation Products, Ecotoxicity, and Environmental Fate.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning and Large Language Models for Modeling Complex Toxicity Pathways and Predicting Steroidogenesis.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Optimized wastewater management utilizing multivariate statistical analysis: a case study of the Mascara wastewater treatment plant, Algeria.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024Article
- Predicting Chemical Immunotoxicity through Data-Driven QSAR Modeling of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonism and Related Toxicity Mechanisms.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Article
- MATH: A Deep Learning Approach in QSAR for Estrogen Receptor Alpha Inhibitors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Data-Driven Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling for Human Carcinogenicity by Chronic Oral Exposure.Environmental science & technology · 2023Article
- Predicting Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Based On the Combination of Chemical Structures and Biological Data.Environmental science & technology · 2022Article
- Article
- Elucidation of Agonist and Antagonist Dynamic Binding Patterns in ER-α by Integration of Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Quantum Mechanical Calculations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Predicting the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Molecules with Machine Learning Models Trained on Biologically Meaningful Descriptors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Revealing Adverse Outcome Pathways from Public High-Throughput Screening Data to Evaluate New Toxicants by a Knowledge-Based Deep Neural Network Approach.Environmental science & technology · 2021Article
- Predictive modeling of estrogen receptor agonism, antagonism, and binding activities using machine- and deep-learning approaches.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2021Article
- ERpred: a web server for the prediction of subtype-specific estrogen receptor antagonists.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Structure-activity relationship-based chemical classification of highly imbalanced Tox21 datasets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2020Article
- Advancing computer-aided drug discovery (CADD) by big data and data-driven machine learning modeling.Drug discovery today · 2020Review
- Computer-Aided Ligand Discovery for Estrogen Receptor Alpha.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Modeling for Drug Discovery.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2020Review
- Article
- Towards accurate high-throughput ligand affinity prediction by exploiting structural ensembles, docking metrics and ligand similarity.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estrogen receptors (ERα) are a critical target for drug design as well as a potential source of toxicity when activated unintentionally. Thus, evaluating potential ERα binding agents is critical in both drug discovery and chemical toxicity areas. Using computational tools, e.g., Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models, can predict potential ERα binding agents before chemical synthesis. The purpose of this project was to develop enhanced predictive models of ERα binding agents by utilizing advanced cheminformatics tools that can integrate publicly available bioassay data. The initial ERα binding agent data set, consisting of 446 binders and 8307 non-binders, was obtained from the Tox21 Challenge project organized by the NIH Chemical Genomics Center (NCGC). After removing the duplicates and inorganic compounds, this data set was used to create a training set (259 binders and 259 non-binders). This training set was used to develop QSAR models using chemical descriptors. The resulting models were then used to predict the binding activity of 264 external compounds, which were available to us after the models were developed. The cross-validation results of training set [Correct Classification Rate (CCR) = 0.72] were much higher than the external predictivity of the unknown compounds (CCR = 0.59). To improve the conventional QSAR models, all compounds in the training set were used to search PubChem and generate a profile of their biological responses across thousands of bioassays. The most important bioassays were prioritized to generate a similarity index that was used to calculate the biosimilarity score between each two compounds. The nearest neighbors for each compound within the set were then identified and its ERα binding potential was predicted by its nearest neighbors in the training set. The hybrid model performance (CCR = 0.94 for cross validation; CCR = 0.68 for external prediction) showed significant improvement over the original QSAR models, particularly for the activity cliffs that induce prediction errors. The results of this study indicate that the response profile of chemicals from public data provides useful information for modeling and evaluation purposes. The public big data resources should be considered along with chemical structure information when predicting new compounds, such as unknown ERα binding agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.