Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27642525›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2016

Progressive FastICA Peel-Off and Convolution Kernel Compensation Demonstrate High Agreement for High Density Surface EMG Decomposition.

Maoqi Chen, Ales Holobar, Xu Zhang, Ping Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Automatic Multichannel Intramuscular Electromyogram Decomposition: Progressive FastICA Peel-Off and Performance Validation.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Novel Validation Approach for High-Density Surface EMG Decomposition in Motor Neuron Disease.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maoqi ChenBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; Guangdong Work Injury Rehabilitation Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ales HolobarFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8338-5978
Xu ZhangBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1533-4340
Ping ZhouGuangdong Work Injury Rehabilitation Center, Guangzhou, China; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; TIRR Memorial Hermann Research Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4394-2677

Funding

High Density Surface EMG Assessment of Motor Unit Alterations after StrokeR01NS080839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ZHOU, PING · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS080839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decomposition of electromyograms (EMG) is a key approach to investigating motor unit plasticity. Various signal processing techniques have been developed for high density surface EMG decomposition, among which the convolution kernel compensation (CKC) has achieved high decomposition yield with extensive validation. Very recently, a progressive FastICA peel-off (PFP) framework has also been developed for high density surface EMG decomposition. In this study, the CKC and PFP methods were independently applied to decompose the same sets of high density surface EMG signals. Across 91 trials of 64-channel surface EMG signals recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of 9 neurologically intact subjects, there were a total of 1477 motor units identified from the two methods, including 969 common motor units. On average, 10.6 ± 4.3 common motor units were identified from each trial, which showed a very high matching rate of 97.85 ± 1.85% in their discharge instants. The high degree of agreement of common motor units from the CKC and the PFP processing provides supportive evidence of the decomposition accuracy for both methods. The different motor units obtained from each method also suggest that combination of the two methods may have the potential to further increase the decomposition yield.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectromyographyAction PotentialsAdultHumansMotor NeuronsMuscle, Skeletal

Identifiers

PMID27642525
PMCPMC5015010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.