ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2016
Evolution of biomedical ontologies and mappings: Overview of recent approaches.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A change language for ontologies and knowledge graphs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Evaluating MedDRA-to-ICD terminology mappings.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Using FlyBase: A Database of Drosophila Genes and Genetics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- An Early Stage Researcher's Primer on Systems Medicine Terminology.Network and systems medicine · 2021Review
- History and Future Perspectives on the Discipline of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling and Its Applications.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- GOcats: A tool for categorizing Gene Ontology into subgraphs of user-defined concepts.PloS one · 2020Article
- ANASTASIA: An Automated Metagenomic Analysis Pipeline for Novel Enzyme Discovery Exploiting Next Generation Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Biomedical ontology alignment: an approach based on representation learning.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2018Article
- ONS: an ontology for a standardized description of interventions and observational studies in nutrition.Genes & nutrition · 2018Article
- Dietary Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Analysis and Taxonomy.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- AgBioData consortium recommendations for sustainable genomics and genetics databases for agriculture.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical ontologies are heavily used to annotate data, and different ontologies are often interlinked by ontology mappings. These ontology-based mappings and annotations are used in many applications and analysis tasks. Since biomedical ontologies are continuously updated dependent artifacts can become outdated and need to undergo evolution as well. Hence there is a need for largely automated approaches to keep ontology-based mappings up-to-date in the presence of evolving ontologies. In this article, we survey current approaches and novel directions in the context of ontology and mapping evolution. We will discuss requirements for mapping adaptation and provide a comprehensive overview on existing approaches. We will further identify open challenges and outline ideas for future developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.