Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27642318›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR2016

Simultaneous Determination of 13 Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tehran's Tap Water and Water for Injection Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Micro Extraction Method and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Ramezan Sadeghi, Farzad Kobarfard, Hassan Yazdanpanah, Samira Eslamizad, Mitra Bayate

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aromatic hydrocarbons extracted by headspace and microextraction methods in water-soluble fractions from crude oil, fuels and lubricants.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramezan SadeghiToxicology and PharmacologyDepartment,SchoolofPharmacy, ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ; Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Farzad KobarfardPhytochemistry Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.; Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan YazdanpanahFood Safety Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.; Toxicology and PharmacologyDepartment,SchoolofPharmacy, ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Samira EslamizadFood Safety Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.; Toxicology and PharmacologyDepartment,SchoolofPharmacy, ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mitra BayatePhytochemistry Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are classified as persistent and carcinogenic organic pollutants. PAHs contamination has been reported in water. Many of relevant regulatory bodies such as EU and EPA have regulated the limit levels for PAHs in drinking water. In this study, 13 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were determined in tap water samples of Tehran and water for injection. Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction procedure combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used for the extraction and determination of PAHs in the samples. Under the optimized conditions, the range of extraction recoveries and relative standard deviations (RSDs) of PAHs in water using internal standard (anthracene-d10) were in the range of 71-90% and 4-16%, respectively. Limit of detection for different PAHs were between 0.03 and 0.1 ngmL(-1). The concentration of PAHs in all tap water as well as water for injection samples were lower than the limit of quantification of PAHs. This is the first study addressing the occurrence of PAHs in water for injection samples in Iran using dispersive liquid-liquid micro extraction procedure combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Indexed as

GC-MSIranPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)Tap waterWater for injection

Identifiers

PMID27642318
PMCPMC5018275
OpenAlexW2408843193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.