Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27642290›Full record

ArticleEURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology2016

Machine learning to predict rapid progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.

Xia Hu, Peter D Reaven, Aramesh Saremi, Ninghao Liu, Mohammad Ali Abbasi, Huan Liu, Raymond Q Migrino, ACT NOW Study Investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xia HuArizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA ; Texas A&M University, College Station, TX USA.
Peter D ReavenArizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA ; Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ USA ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ USA.
Aramesh SaremiPhoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ USA.
Ninghao LiuTexas A&M University, College Station, TX USA.
Mohammad Ali AbbasiArizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA.
Huan LiuArizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA.
Raymond Q MigrinoPhoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ USA ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ USA.
ACT NOW Study Investigators
Arizona State University · USPhoenix VA Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrediabetes is a major epidemic and is associated with adverse cardio-cerebrovascular outcomes. Early identification of patients who will develop rapid progression of atherosclerosis could be beneficial for improved risk stratification. In this paper, we investigate important factors impacting the prediction, using several machine learning methods, of rapid progression of carotid intima-media thickness in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) participants.

methodsIn the Actos Now for Prevention of Diabetes (ACT NOW) study, 382 participants with IGT underwent carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) ultrasound evaluation at baseline and at 15-18 months, and were divided into rapid progressors (RP,

resultsThe experimental results show that the proposed learning methods performed well in identifying or predicting RP. Among the methods, the performance of Naïve Bayes was the best (AUC 0.797, Brier score 0.085) compared to multilayer perceptron (0.729, 0.086) and random forest (0.642, 0.10). The results also show that feature selection has a significant positive impact on the data prediction performance.

conclusionsBy dealing with multi-modal data, the proposed learning methods show effectiveness in predicting prediabetics at risk for rapid atherosclerosis progression. The proposed framework demonstrated utility in outcome prediction in a typical multidimensional clinical dataset with a relatively small number of subjects, extending the potential utility of machine learning approaches beyond extremely large-scale datasets.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisDiabetesMachine learningModelPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27642290
PMCPMC5011483
OpenAlexW2509730946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.