Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27642234›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of food science & technology2016

A review of the impact of processing on nutrient bioaccessibility and digestion of almonds.

Myriam Marie-Louise Grundy, Karen Lapsley, Peter Rory Ellis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of food science & technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Is a Handful an Effective Way to Guide Nut Recommendations?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Myriam Marie-Louise GrundyDiabetes and Nutritional Sciences King's College London Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street London SE1 9NH UK.
Karen LapsleyAlmond Board of California 1150 Ninth Street Ste.1500 Modesto CA 95354 USA.
Peter Rory EllisDiabetes and Nutritional Sciences King's College London Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street London SE1 9NH UK.
King's College London · GBAlmond Board of California · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H004866/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almond kernels contain phytochemicals and nutrients that potentially have positive health benefits in relation to heart disease, diabetes and obesity. One important mechanism associated with these benefits is an imposed limit on bioaccessibility (release) of nutrients, such as lipids, from almond tissue during mastication and digestion. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of food structure during the digestion of plant foods. In particular, in the almond kernel, depending on its structure and degree of processing, the amount of lipid released from the almond tissue matrix and the fatty acids produced from lipolysis has been found to vary substantially. This review aims at discussing the commercial methods of almond processing and the different almond forms produced for human consumption, mainly with respect to their impact on nutrient composition, digestion and metabolism.

Indexed as

Almondsbioaccessibility/digestibilitydietary fibrelipidsprocessing effects

Identifiers

PMID27642234
PMCPMC5003169
OpenAlexW2497359825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.