Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27641997›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Angiogenic microspheres promote neural regeneration and motor function recovery after spinal cord injury in rats.

Shukui Yu, Shenglian Yao, Yujun Wen, Ying Wang, Hao Wang, Qunyuan Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rewiring the Spine-Cutting-Edge Stem Cell Therapies for Spinal Cord Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biomaterial-Based bFGF Delivery for Nerve Repair.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Cell transplantation to repair the injured spinal cord.International review of neurobiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shukui YuDepartment of Neurobiology, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Center of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Beijing Key Laboratory of Major Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao, You An Men, Beijing 100069, China.
Shenglian YaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100083, China.
Yujun WenDepartment of Neurobiology, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Center of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Beijing Key Laboratory of Major Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao, You An Men, Beijing 100069, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao, You An Men, Beijing 100069, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao, You An Men, Beijing 100069, China.
Qunyuan XuDepartment of Neurobiology, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Center of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Beijing Key Laboratory of Major Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao, You An Men, Beijing 100069, China.
Capital Medical University · CNChinese Institute for Brain Research · CNUniversity of Science and Technology Beijing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined sustained co-delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiopoietin-1 and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) encapsulated in angiogenic microspheres. These spheres were delivered to sites of spinal cord contusion injury in rats, and their ability to induce vessel formation, neural regeneration and improve hindlimb motor function was assessed. At 2-8 weeks after spinal cord injury, ELISA-determined levels of VEGF, angiopoietin-1, and bFGF were significantly higher in spinal cord tissues in rats that received angiogenic microspheres than in those that received empty microspheres. Sites of injury in animals that received angiogenic microspheres also contained greater numbers of isolectin B4-binding vessels and cells positive for nestin or β III-tubulin (P < 0.01), significantly more NF-positive and serotonergic fibers, and more MBP-positive mature oligodendrocytes. Animals receiving angiogenic microspheres also suffered significantly less loss of white matter volume. At 10 weeks after injury, open field tests showed that animals that received angiogenic microspheres scored significantly higher on the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan scale than control animals (P < 0.01). Our results suggest that biodegradable, biocompatible PLGA microspheres can release angiogenic factors in a sustained fashion into sites of spinal cord injury and markedly stimulate angiogenesis and neurogenesis, accelerating recovery of neurologic function.

Indexed as

MicrospheresNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsAnisotropyAxonsEphrin-A3FemaleLactic AcidMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicroRNAsMotor ActivityNerve RegenerationNeural Stem CellsOrgan SizePolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerEphrin-A3Lactic AcidMicroRNAsMIRN210 microRNA, ratPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer

Identifiers

PMID27641997
PMCPMC5027575
OpenAlexW2522529686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.