Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27641422›Full record

ArticleProgress in orthodontics2016

Three-dimensional evaluation of root dimensions and alveolar ridge width of maxillary lateral incisors in patients with unilateral agenesis.

Sharifah AlRushaid, Taranpreet Chandhoke, Achint Utreja, Aditya Tadinada, Veerasathpurush Allareddy, Flavio Uribe

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharifah AlRushaidPrivate practice Kuwait City, Kuwait; former resident Division of Orthodontics,Department of Craniofacial Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Taranpreet ChandhokeDivision of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Sciences, University of Connecitcut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Achint UtrejaDepartment of Orthodontics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Aditya TadinadaDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Veerasathpurush AllareddyCollege of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Flavio UribeDivision of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Sciences, University of Connecitcut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA. Furibe@uchc.edu.
University of Connecticut · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USKuwait University · KWUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this retrospective case-control study was to measure the maxillary lateral incisor root dimensions and quantify the labial and palatal bone in patients with unilateral maxillary lateral incisor agenesis (MLIA) after orthodontic treatment and compare them to non-agenesis controls using cone beam computed tomography.

methodsThe labiopalatal and mesiodistal root dimensions, mesiodistal coronal dimensions, and labiopalatal bone and alveolar ridge widths of the maxillary lateral incisor were assessed on posttreatment cone beam computed tomography scans of 15 patients (mean age 16.5 ± 3.4 years, 9 females and 6 males) with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis and 15 gender-matched patients (mean age 16.08 ± 3.23 years) with no dental agenesis or anterior Bolton discrepancy. The Mann-Whitney test was used to distinguish any differences in root width, crown width, or changes in labial or palatal bone width between the two groups.

resultsThe median labiopalatal root width was narrower in the MLIA group at the level of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to 8 mm apical of the CEJ compared to controls (p ≤ 0.009). The mesiodistal root width was significantly reduced in the MLIA group at the CEJ and at 4 mm apical to the CEJ. The labiopalatal alveolar ridge width was significantly decreased at 2 mm apical to the CEJ in MLIA group. The mesiodistal crown width was significantly smaller in the MLIA group at both the incisal edge and at the crown midpoint. The bone thickness was similar in both groups.

conclusionsCoronal and root dimensions in patients with MLIA were reduced compared to controls. Alveolar ridge width was also reduced in patients with MLIA, although bone thickness was not different than controls.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlveolar ProcessAnodontiaCase-Control StudiesChildCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIncisorMaleMaxillaOrthodontics, CorrectivePalateRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27641422
PMCPMC5056163
OpenAlexW57055397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.