ReviewOncogene2017
Translational research in neuroendocrine tumors: pitfalls and opportunities.
Review in Oncogene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06523582 (Genetic Bases of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Mexican Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genetic Bases of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Mexican Patients
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Germline Mutations in DNA Repair Genes in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Overlapping Presentations and Diverse Genetic Defects Characterize Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in a Mexican Cohort.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- The uprise of RNA biology in neuroendocrine neoplasms: altered splicing and RNA species unveil translational opportunities.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023Review
- Preclinical Models of Neuroendocrine Neoplasia.Cancers · 2022Review
- Cdk5 drives formation of heterogeneous pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Oncogenesis · 2021Article
- A multigenomic liquid biopsy biomarker for neuroendocrine tumor disease outperforms CgA and has surgical and clinical utility.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2021Observational
- Review
- Article
- Circulating Neuroendocrine Gene Transcripts (NETest): A Postoperative Strategy for Early Identification of the Efficacy of Radical Surgery for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection.Endocrine · 2020Article
- Biomarkers for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (PanNENs) Management-An Updated Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Anti-tumour activity of everolimus and sunitinib in neuroendocrine neoplasms.Endocrine connections · 2019Article
- Time for a change and to adopt a novel molecular genomic approach in NETs.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019Article
- Genetics and Epigenetics of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Endocrine reviews · 2019Review
- Ghrelin-O-Acyltransferase (GOAT) Enzyme as a Novel Potential Biomarker in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Molecular Genetic Studies of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: New Therapeutic Approaches.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2018Review
- Multilayered heterogeneity as an intrinsic hallmark of neuroendocrine tumors.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2018Review
- Genomic landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the International Cancer Genome Consortium.The Journal of endocrinology · 2018Review
- Clinical and functional implication of the components of somatostatin system in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Endocrine · 2018Article
- EPB41L5 is Associated With the Metastatic Potential of Low-grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in research on neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has grown in the past 10 years, coinciding with improvements in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of NETs. In addition, NETs have become one of the most exciting settings for drug development. Two targeted agents for the management of advanced pancreatic NETs have been approved, but the development of targeted agents for NETs is limited by problems with both patient selection and demonstration of activity. In this review, we analyze these limitations and discuss ways to increase the predictive value of preclinical models for target discovery and drug development. The role of translational research and 'omics' methodologies is emphasized, with the final aim of developing personalized medicine. Because NETs usually grow slowly and metastatic tumors are found at easily accessible locations, and owing to improvements in techniques for liquid biopsies, NETs provide a unique opportunity to obtain tumor samples at all stages of the evolution of the disease and to adapt treatment to changes in tumor biology. Combining clinical and translational research is essential to achieve progress in the NET field. Slow growth and genetic stability limit and challenge both the availability and further development of preclinical models of NETs, one of the most crucial unmet research needs in the field. Finally, we suggest some useful approaches for improving clinical drug development for NETs: moving from classical RECIST-based response end points to survival parameters; searching for different criteria to define response rates (for example, antiangiogenic effects and metabolic responses); implementing randomized phase II studies to avoid single-arm phase II studies that produce limited data on drug efficacy; and using predictive biomarkers for patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27641330What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.