Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27640675›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

DNA barcoding reveal patterns of species diversity among northwestern Pacific molluscs.

Shao'e Sun, Qi Li, Lingfeng Kong, Hong Yu, Xiaodong Zheng, Ruihai Yu, Lina Dai, Yan Sun, Jun Chen, Jun Liu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic and Haplotype Diversity of Manila ClamAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. DNA barcoding as a valuable tool for delimiting mollusk species of the genusFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shao'e SunKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Qi LiKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Lingfeng KongKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Hong YuKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Xiaodong ZhengKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Ruihai YuKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Lina DaiKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Yan SunKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Jun ChenKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Jun LiuKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Lehai NiKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Yanwei FengKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Zhenzhen YuKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Shanmei ZouKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
Jiping LinKey Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study represents the first comprehensive molecular assessment of northwestern Pacific molluscs. In total, 2801 DNA barcodes belonging to 569 species from China, Japan and Korea were analyzed. An overlap between intra- and interspecific genetic distances was present in 71 species. We tested the efficacy of this library by simulating a sequence-based specimen identification scenario using Best Match (BM), Best Close Match (BCM) and All Species Barcode (ASB) criteria with three threshold values. BM approach returned 89.15% true identifications (95.27% when excluding singletons). The highest success rate of congruent identifications was obtained with BCM at 0.053 threshold. The analysis of our barcode library together with public data resulted in 582 Barcode Index Numbers (BINs), 72.2% of which was found to be concordantly with morphology-based identifications. The discrepancies were divided in two groups: sequences from different species clustered in a single BIN and conspecific sequences divided in one more BINs. In Neighbour-Joining phenogram, 2,320 (83.0%) queries fromed 355 (62.4%) species-specific barcode clusters allowing their successful identification. 33 species showed paraphyletic and haplotype sharing. 62 cases are represented by deeply diverged lineages. This study suggest an increased species diversity in this region, highlighting taxonomic revision and conservation strategy for the cryptic complexes.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsBase SequenceDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicElectron Transport Complex IVGenetic VariationGeographyMolluscaPacific OceanPhylogenySpecies SpecificityElectron Transport Complex IV

Identifiers

PMID27640675
PMCPMC5027561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.