Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27640531›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2016

Actinomyces spp. gene expression in root caries lesions.

Naile Dame-Teixeira, Clarissa Cavalcanti Fatturi Parolo, Marisa Maltz, Aradhna Tugnait, Deirdre Devine, Thuy Do

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naile Dame-TeixeiraFaculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; nailedame@hotmail.comn.t.do@leeds.ac.uk.
Clarissa Cavalcanti Fatturi ParoloFaculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Marisa MaltzFaculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Aradhna TugnaitSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, UK.
Deirdre DevineSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, UK.
Thuy DoSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, UK; nailedame@hotmail.comn.t.do@leeds.ac.uk.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust R245/0212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe studies of the distribution of Actinomyces spp. on carious and non-carious root surfaces have not been able to confirm the association of these bacteria with root caries, although they were extensively implicated as a prime suspect in root caries.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to observe the gene expression of Actinomyces spp. in the microbiota of root surfaces with and without caries.

designThe oral biofilms from exposed sound root surface (SRS; n=10) and active root caries (RC; n=30) samples were collected. The total bacterial RNA was extracted, and the mRNA was isolated. Samples with low RNA concentration were pooled, yielding a final sample size of SRS=10 and RC=9. Complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries were prepared and sequenced on an Illumina(®) HiSeq 2500 system. Sequence reads were mapped to eight Actinomyces genomes. Count data were normalized using DESeq2 to analyse differential gene expression applying the Benjamini-Hochberg correction (false discovery rate [FDR]<0.001).

resultsActinomyces spp. had similar numbers of reads (Mann-Whitney U-test; p>0.05), except for Actinomyces OT178 (p=0.001) and Actinomyces gerencseriae (p=0.004), which had higher read counts in the SRS. Genes that code for stress proteins (clp, dnaK, and groEL), enzymes of glycolysis pathways (including enolase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase), adhesion (Type-2 fimbrial and collagen-binding protein), and cell growth (EF-Tu) were highly - but not differentially (p>0.001) - expressed in both groups. Genes with the most significant upregulation in RC were those coding for hypothetical proteins and uracil DNA glycosylase (p=2.61E-17). The gene with the most significant upregulation in SRS was a peptide ABC transporter substrate-binding protein (log2FC=-6.00, FDR=2.37E-05).

conclusionThere were similar levels of Actinomyces gene expression in both sound and carious root biofilms. These bacteria can be commensal in root surface sites but may be cariogenic due to survival mechanisms that allow them to exist in acid environments and to metabolize sugars, saving energy.

Indexed as

Actinomyces spp.differential expressionRNA-seqroot cariestranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27640531
PMCPMC5027334
OpenAlexW2519375806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.