Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27640066›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2017

Long-term follow-up of the outcome of supracervical versus total abdominal hysterectomy.

Seija Ala-Nissilä, Mervi Haarala, Tuija Järvenpää, Juha Mäkinen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02166749 (Ultra Long-term Follow-up of the Outcome After Subtotal Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02166749 completednot on this map

Ultra Long-term Follow-up of the Outcome After Subtotal Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan1997 to 2011Enrolled212ConditionsAbdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim)ArmsSubtotal abdominal hysterectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seija Ala-NissiläDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, FI-20520, Turku, Finland. seija.ala-nissila@tyks.fi.
Mervi HaaralaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Vakka-Suomi Hospital, Uusikaupunki, Finland.
Tuija JärvenpääDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Vakka-Suomi Hospital, Uusikaupunki, Finland.
Juha MäkinenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.
Turku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisHysterectomy for benign indications can be performed either as a supracervical or a total procedure. It is controversial whether removing the cervix is beneficial or not. This study aimed at comparing long-term outcomes after supracervical (n = 107) and total (n = 105) abdominal hysterectomy.

methodsTwo prospective questionnaire-based studies were conducted among the original 212 patients operated on between February 1978 and May 1979 at Turku University Hospital, Finland. In the first study in 1997, a nonvalidated questionnaire was mailed to 193 patients to inquire about any postoperative symptoms. In the second study in 2011, a validated questionnaire and an invitation to a follow-up visit were sent to 153 women. During the visit, pelvic support was assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Additionally, hospital records were reviewed to identify any gynecological operations at both evaluation times.

resultsIn the first evaluation, the response rate was 94 %, and in the second, the rate was 62 %. Objective evaluation was possible in 75 women in 2011, 37 in the supracervical group and 38 in the total hysterectomy group. There were no significant differences in the rates of subjective urinary and sexual symptoms or subsequent operations for urinary incontinence and genital prolapse between women in the supracervical group and women in the total hysterectomy group. Four patients in the supracervical group required a re-operation: three for a prolapsed cervical stump and one for a cervical abscess.

conclusionsSupracervical and total hysterectomies resulted in similar postoperative outcomes regarding subjective symptoms and subsequent gynecological operations during a follow-up of 33 years. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT02166749.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeHysterectomyLong-term follow-upSubjective outcomeSupracervical hysterectomyUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID27640066
OpenAlexW2520239104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.