Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27639847›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2016

Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic evaluations of a new coated chloroquine tablet in a single-arm open-label non-comparative trial in Brazil: a step towards a user-friendly malaria vivax treatment.

Dhelio Pereira, André Daher, Graziela Zanini, Ivan Maia, Lais Fonseca, Luciana Pitta, Rosilene Ruffato, Paola Marchesini, Cor Jesus Fontes

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dhelio PereiraTropical Medicine Research Center of Rondônia (CEPEM), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
André DaherInstitute of Drug Technology (Farmanguinhos), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. andredaher@gmail.com.
Graziela ZaniniLaboratory of Parasitology, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ivan MaiaVice-presidency of Research and Reference Laboratories, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lais FonsecaLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics (Sefar), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luciana PittaInstitute of Drug Technology (Farmanguinhos), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rosilene RuffatoTropical Medicine Research Center of Rondônia (CEPEM), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
Paola MarchesiniNational Programme of Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Cor Jesus FontesJulio Müller Hospital, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRMinistério da Saúde · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains a major public health problem, with half the world population at risk of contracting malaria. The effects of Plasmodium vivax on prosperity and longevity have been highlighted in several recent clinical case reports. The first line of vivax treatment drugs has seen no radical innovation for more than 60 years. This study introduces a subtle incremental innovation to vivax treatment: a chloroquine and primaquine co-blister. The co-blister includes a new chloroquine formulation incorporating coated tablets to mask the drug's bitter taste and user-friendly packaging containing tablets of each drug, which may improve patient adherence and facilitate the appropriate use of the drugs. This new formulation will replace the non-coated chloroquine distributed in Brazil.

methodsPatients were orally treated with 150 mg coated chloroquine tablets for 3 days: an initial 450 mg dose, followed by two 300 mg doses. The patients were treated concomitantly with two 15 mg primaquine tablets for 7-9 days, according to their weight. The primary objective of this study was to prove parasitological and clinical cure rates above 90 % by day 28.

resultsThis single-arm open-label non-comparative trial was conducted according to the WHO recommended methodology for the surveillance of anti-malarial drug efficacy in the Brazilian Amazon. On day 28, the parasitological and clinical response was adequate in 98.8 % of patients (CI 95 % 93.4-100 %). The success rate on day 3 was 100 %, and the cumulative success rate by day 28 was 98.8 % (CI 95 % 91.7-99.8 %). There were no serious adverse events, with most adverse events classified as mild. The pharmacokinetic parameters of chloroquine analysed in whole blood dry spot samples showed mean (coefficient of variation) Cmax and AUC0-t values of 374.44 (0.35) and 3700.43 (0.36) ng/mL, respectively. DISCUSSION: This study reports an appropriate safety and efficacy profile of a new formulation of coated chloroquine tablets for vivax malaria treatment in the Brazilian Amazon. The cure rates meet the WHO efficacy criteria, supporting current Brazilian guidelines and the use of the formulation for vivax malaria treatment. Nevertheless, further studies should be conducted to address adherence and the effectiveness of the formulation. Trial registration RBR-77q7t3-UTN: U1111-1121-2982. Registered 10th May 2011.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntimalarialsBrazilChloroquineFemaleHumansMalaria, VivaxMaleMiddle AgedPrimaquineTabletsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntimalarialsChloroquinePrimaquineTabletsAdherenceAntimalarial treatmentChloroquineClinical trialMalariaPharmacokineticsPlasmodium vivax

Identifiers

PMID27639847
PMCPMC5027105
OpenAlexW2520248023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.