Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27639692›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2016

Illness perceptions of gout patients and the use of allopurinol in primary care: baseline findings from a prospective cohort study.

Ciaran P Walsh, James A Prior, Priyanka Chandratre, John Belcher, Christian D Mallen, Edward Roddy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ciaran P WalshResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
James A PriorResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK. j.a.prior@keele.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9213-2796
Priyanka ChandratreResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
John BelcherResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Christian D MallenResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Edward RoddyResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Keele University · GB

Funding

Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients' perceptions of their illness are dynamic and can directly influence aspects of management. Our aim was to examine the illness perceptions of gout patients in UK primary care and associations with allopurinol use.

methodsA health questionnaire was sent to 1805 people with gout aged ≥18 years identified by a gout diagnosis or prescriptions for allopurinol or colchicine in their primary care medical records in the preceding 2 years. The questionnaire included selected items from the revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Associations between illness perceptions and use of allopurinol were calculated using multinomial logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, deprivation status, body mass index, alcohol consumption, comorbidities and gout characteristics.

resultsOne thousand one hundred eighty-four participants responded to the baseline questionnaire (65.6 %). Approximately half of responders perceived that they were able to control (51.2 %) or affect their gout through their own actions (44.8 %). Three quarters perceived treatments to be effective (76.4 %) and agreed that gout is a serious condition (76.4 %). Patients who agreed that they could control their gout (Relative Risk Ratio, 95 % confidence interval 1.66 (1.12 to 2.45)) and that treatments were effective (2.24 (1.32 to 3.81)) were more likely to currently be using allopurinol than not using allopurinol. However, this significance was attenuated after adjustment for self-reported gout characteristics (1.39 (0.89 to 2.17) & 1.78 (0.96 to 3.29) respectively).

conclusionsPatients who perceive that they can control their gout and that treatments are effective are more likely to be using allopurinol, this suggests that better information is needed for the patient from GPs and rheumatologist to reassure and support their use of ULT.

Indexed as

AgedAllopurinolFemaleGoutGout SuppressantsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAllopurinolGout SuppressantsAllopurinolEpidemiologyGoutIllness perceptionPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID27639692
PMCPMC5027094
OpenAlexW2519497282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.