ArticleJournal of forensic and legal medicine2016
"An absolutely necessary piece": A qualitative study of legal perspectives on medical affidavits in the asylum process.
Article in Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Medical-Legal Partnerships Serving Immigrant Communities in the United States.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2021Pooled it
- Predictors of Asylum Approval: Insights from a Decade of Forensic Medical Evaluations at a Student-Run Clinic.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Medico-legal assessment of physical abuses in asylum cases: a multidisciplinary role for multiform issues.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Advocacy and Assessment: Ethical Dilemmas and Practice Considerations in Pediatric Asylum Evaluations.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2026Article
- Development of a virtual asylum medicine curriculum: applying a medical education model to a global health priority.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Characteristics and Guardianship Status of Children Undergoing Forensic Medical and Psychological Evaluation for Asylum in Miami.Health and human rights · 2024Article
- Ethical and Forensic Issues in the Medico-Legal and Psychological Assessment of Women Asylum Seekers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Lessons from Asylum Seekers: How Forensic Medical Evaluations Can Teach Us Things We Didn't Learn in Medical School.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Patterns and evidence of human rights violations among US asylum seekers.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Challenges in Founding and Developing Medical School Student-Run Asylum Clinics.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2021Article
- Validity of Psychiatric Evaluation of Asylum Seekers through Telephone.Case reports in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Piloting forensic tele-mental health evaluations of asylum seekers.Psychiatry research · 2020Article
- Evaluating the Impact of Student-run Asylum Clinics in the US from 2016-2018.Health and human rights · 2019Article
- Asylum Medicine: Standard and Best Practices.Health and human rights · 2019Article
- Asylum Seekers in a Time of Record Forced Global Displacement: the Role of Physicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A key challenge for asylum seekers in the United States is being able to provide evidence of prior persecution in their home countries. Medical/psychological affidavits corroborating applicants' accounts often make the difference between successful and unsuccessful applications. The purpose of this study was to identify the unmet demand for and features of effective medical/psychological affidavits in the asylum process, as well as the personal and systemic barriers for asylum seekers. This is a qualitative study of semi-structured interviews with legal professionals who work in asylum law. Sixteen asylum lawyers and one Board of Immigration Appeals accredited representative practicing in the state of Michigan, United States, participated in this study. All participants noted that a vast majority of their asylum cases would benefit from a medical affidavit but that they have difficulty finding qualified physicians with experience writing such affidavits and testifying as expert witnesses. The major barriers to obtaining medical/psychological evaluations included inability to pay for services, lack of practitioner availability, and lack of practitioner training. The participants reported that features of a strong medical affidavit included clear, concise, and corroborative accounts that supported the applicant's story from a diagnostic perspective and forensic descriptions that reinforced the credibility of the applicant. Several also noted that medical/psychological evaluations frequently would reveal additional details and incidents of trauma beyond those stated in the applicant's preliminary statement. The study results suggest substantial unmet need for trained physicians to perform medical and psychological evaluations on a pro bono basis. Lawyers' recommendations regarding effective medical affidavits and necessary ongoing support for asylum applicants should inform current efforts to improve physician and lawyer collaborations on asylum cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.