Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27639654›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic and legal medicine2016

"An absolutely necessary piece": A qualitative study of legal perspectives on medical affidavits in the asylum process.

Elizabeth Scruggs, Timothy C Guetterman, Anna C Meyer, Jamie VanArtsdalen, Michele Heisler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Asylum Medicine: Standard and Best Practices.Health and human rights · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth ScruggsUniversity of Michigan Medical School, M4101 Medical Science Building I - C Wing, 1301 Catherine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5624, United States. Electronic address: escruggs@umich.edu.
Timothy C GuettermanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, United States. Electronic address: tguetter@umich.edu.
Anna C MeyerDepartment of Ob/Gyn Residency Program, University of Wisconsin, United States. Electronic address: ameyer4@uwhealth.org.
Jamie VanArtsdalenDepartment of Ob/Gyn Residency Program, University of Michigan, United States. Electronic address: jvanarts@umich.edu.
Michele HeislerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, United States; Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Practice Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: mheisler@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
Transforming Translational Science and Education to Benefit Human HealthUL1TR000043 · NCATS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, BARRY · 2012 to 2015
$26.8M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Pre-Visit Prioritization for Complex Primary Care Patients with DiabetesR01DK099108 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GRANT, RICHARD W · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000043NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key challenge for asylum seekers in the United States is being able to provide evidence of prior persecution in their home countries. Medical/psychological affidavits corroborating applicants' accounts often make the difference between successful and unsuccessful applications. The purpose of this study was to identify the unmet demand for and features of effective medical/psychological affidavits in the asylum process, as well as the personal and systemic barriers for asylum seekers. This is a qualitative study of semi-structured interviews with legal professionals who work in asylum law. Sixteen asylum lawyers and one Board of Immigration Appeals accredited representative practicing in the state of Michigan, United States, participated in this study. All participants noted that a vast majority of their asylum cases would benefit from a medical affidavit but that they have difficulty finding qualified physicians with experience writing such affidavits and testifying as expert witnesses. The major barriers to obtaining medical/psychological evaluations included inability to pay for services, lack of practitioner availability, and lack of practitioner training. The participants reported that features of a strong medical affidavit included clear, concise, and corroborative accounts that supported the applicant's story from a diagnostic perspective and forensic descriptions that reinforced the credibility of the applicant. Several also noted that medical/psychological evaluations frequently would reveal additional details and incidents of trauma beyond those stated in the applicant's preliminary statement. The study results suggest substantial unmet need for trained physicians to perform medical and psychological evaluations on a pro bono basis. Lawyers' recommendations regarding effective medical affidavits and necessary ongoing support for asylum applicants should inform current efforts to improve physician and lawyer collaborations on asylum cases.

Indexed as

DocumentationHealth StatusHumansMedical History TakingMental HealthPhysical ExaminationQualitative ResearchRefugeesUnited StatesAsylum evaluationAsylum seekersForensic medicineHuman rightsUnderserved care

Identifiers

PMID27639654
PMCPMC5121032
OpenAlexW2510752078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.