Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27639438›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials2016

Heralding a new paradigm in 3D tumor modeling.

Eliza L S Fong, Daniel A Harrington, Mary C Farach-Carson, Hanry Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Exploring bone-tumor interactions through 3DJournal of bone oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Engineering Heterogeneous Tumor Models for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  14. Contribution of the ELRs to the development of advancedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eliza L S FongDepartment of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: bieflse@nus.edu.sg.
Daniel A HarringtonDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, USA.
Mary C Farach-CarsonDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, USA. Electronic address: farachca@rice.edu.
Hanry YuDepartment of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore; Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis: Biology and TargetingP01CA098912 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ZAYZAFOON, MAJD · 2003 to 2019
$24.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA098912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies to date have contributed to a paradigm shift in modeling cancer, moving from the traditional two-dimensional culture system to three-dimensional (3D) culture systems for cancer cell culture. This led to the inception of tumor engineering, which has undergone rapid advances over the years. In line with the recognition that tumors are not merely masses of proliferating cancer cells but rather, highly complex tissues consisting of a dynamic extracellular matrix together with stromal, immune and endothelial cells, significant efforts have been made to better recapitulate the tumor microenvironment in 3D. These approaches include the development of engineered matrices and co-cultures to replicate the complexity of tumor-stroma interactions in vitro. However, the tumor engineering and cancer biology fields have traditionally relied heavily on the use of cancer cell lines as a cell source in tumor modeling. While cancer cell lines have contributed to a wealth of knowledge in cancer biology, the use of this cell source is increasingly perceived as a major contributing factor to the dismal failure rate of oncology drugs in drug development. Backing this notion is the increasing evidence that tumors possess intrinsic heterogeneity, which predominantly homogeneous cancer cell lines poorly reflect. Tumor heterogeneity contributes to therapeutic resistance in patients. To overcome this limitation, cancer cell lines are beginning to be replaced by primary tumor cell sources, in the form of patient-derived xenografts and organoids cultures. Moving forward, we propose that further advances in tumor engineering would require that tumor heterogeneity (tumor variants) be taken into consideration together with tumor complexity (tumor-stroma interactions). In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of what has been achieved in recapitulating tumor complexity, and discuss the importance of incorporating tumor heterogeneity into 3D in vitro tumor models. This work carves out the roadmap for 3D tumor engineering and highlights some of the challenges that need to be addressed as we move forward into the next chapter.

Indexed as

AnimalsBatch Cell Culture TechniquesEquipment DesignHumansNeoplasms, ExperimentalPrinting, Three-DimensionalSpheroids, CellularTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTumor Cells, Cultured3D tumor modelsCancerOrganoidsPatient-derived xenograftsTumor heterogeneityTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID27639438
PMCPMC5730082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.