Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27639388›Full record

Observational studySkeletal radiology2016

Ex vivo quantitative multiparametric MRI mapping of human meniscus degeneration.

Sven Nebelung, Markus Tingart, Thomas Pufe, Christiane Kuhl, Holger Jahr, Daniel Truhn

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Skeletal radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. TSkeletal radiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Relating MR relaxation times ofOsteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2020
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sven NebelungDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. snebelung@ukaachen.de.
Markus TingartDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Thomas PufeInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Wendlingweg 2, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Christiane KuhlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Holger JahrDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Daniel TruhnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of T1, T1ρ, T2, T2*, and UTE-T2* (ultrashort-echo time-enhanced T2*) mapping in the refined graduation of human meniscus degeneration with histology serving as standard-of-reference. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis IRB-approved intra-individual comparative ex vivo study was performed on 24 lateral meniscus body samples obtained from 24 patients undergoing total knee replacement. Samples were assessed on a 3.0-T MRI scanner using inversion-recovery (T1), spin-lock multi-gradient-echo (T1ρ), multi-spin-echo (T2) and multi-gradient-echo (T2* and UTE-T2*) sequences to determine relaxation times of quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters. Relaxation times were calculated on the respective maps, averaged to the entire meniscus and to its zones. Histologically, samples were analyzed on a four-point score according to Williams (0-III). QMRI results and Williams (sub)scores were correlated using Spearman's ρ, while Williams grade-dependent differences were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests. Sensitivities and specificities in the detection of intact (Williams grade [WG]-0) and severely degenerate meniscus (WG-II-III) were calculated.

resultsExcept for T2*, significant increases in qMRI parameters with increasing Williams grades were observed. T1, T1ρ, T2, and UTE-T2* exhibited high sensitivity and variable specificity rates. Significant marked-to-strong correlations were observed for these parameters with each other, with histological WGs and the subscores tissue integrity and cellularity.

conclusionsQMRI mapping holds promise in the objective evaluation of human meniscus. Although sufficient discriminatory power of T1, T1ρ, T2, and UTE-T2* was only demonstrated for the histological extremes, these data may aid in the future MRI-based parameterization and quantification of human meniscus degeneration.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMaleMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTibial Meniscus InjuriesDegenerationHistologyMeniscusMRI parametersQuantitative MRI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.