Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27639374›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2016

Comprehensive genomic characterization of five canine lymphoid tumor cell lines.

Sarah C Roode, Daniel Rotroff, Kristy L Richards, Peter Moore, Alison Motsinger-Reif, Yasuhiko Okamura, Takuya Mizuno, Hajime Tsujimoto, Steven E Suter, Matthew Breen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah C RoodeDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, CVM Research Building - Room 348, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, 27607, NC, USA.
Daniel RotroffBioinformatics Research Center, Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Kristy L RichardsDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Peter MooreDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Alison Motsinger-ReifBioinformatics Research Center, Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Yasuhiko OkamuraVeterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Morioka, Japan.
Takuya MizunoLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Hajime TsujimotoGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Japan.
Steven E SuterComparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. steven_suter@ncsu.edu.
Matthew BreenDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, CVM Research Building - Room 348, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, 27607, NC, USA. Matthew_Breen@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · USCancer Genetics (United States) · USIwate University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of California, Davis · USYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeukemia/lymphoma cell lines have been critical in the investigation of the pathogenesis and therapy of hematological malignancies. While human LL cell lines have generally been found to recapitulate the primary tumors from which they were derived, appropriate characterization including cytogenetic and transcriptional assessment is crucial for assessing their clinical predictive value.

resultsIn the following study, five canine LL cell lines, CLBL-1, Ema, TL-1 (Nody-1), UL-1, and 3132, were characterized using extensive immunophenotyping, karyotypic analysis, oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (oaCGH), and gene expression profiling. Genome-wide DNA copy number data from the cell lines were also directly compared with 299 primary canine round cell tumors to determine whether the cell lines represent primary tumors, and, if so, what subtype each most closely resembled.

conclusionsBased on integrated analyses, CLBL-1 was classified as B-cell lymphoma, Ema and TL-1 as T-cell lymphoma, and UL-1 as T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 3132, originally classified as a B-cell lymphoma, was reclassified as a histiocytic sarcoma based on characteristic cytogenomic properties. In combination, these data begin to elucidate the clinical predictive value of these cell lines which will enhance the appropriate selection of in vitro models for future studies of canine hematological malignancies.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorAnimalsCytogenetic AnalysisDogsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomeLymphoma

Identifiers

PMID27639374
PMCPMC5027081
OpenAlexW2519392791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.