Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27639284›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2017

Heterochromatic histone modifications at transposons in Xenopus tropicalis embryos.

Ila van Kruijsbergen, Saartje Hontelez, Dei M Elurbe, Simon J van Heeringen, Martijn A Huynen, Gert Jan C Veenstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The rebirth of repressive chromatin during early vertebrate development.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epigenomic dynamics of early Xenopus Embryos.Development, growth & differentiation · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ila van Kruijsbergen *Radboud University, Department of Molecular Developmental Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Saartje Hontelez *Radboud University, Department of Molecular Developmental Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dei M ElurbeRadboud University Medical Center, Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Simon J van HeeringenRadboud University, Department of Molecular Developmental Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martijn A HuynenRadboud University Medical Center, Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gert Jan C VeenstraRadboud University, Department of Molecular Developmental Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Epigenome maps of regulatory activity in Xenopus tropicalis embryosR01HD069344 · NICHD · STICHTING RADBOUD UNIVERSITEIT · PI VEENSTRA, GERT JAN C. · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements are parasitic genomic elements that can be deleterious for host gene function and genome integrity. Heterochromatic histone modifications are involved in the repression of transposons. However, it remains unknown how these histone modifications mark different types of transposons during embryonic development. Here we document the variety of heterochromatic epigenetic signatures at parasitic elements during development in Xenopus tropicalis, using genome-wide ChIP-sequencing data and ChIP-qPCR analysis. We show that specific subsets of transposons in various families and subfamilies are marked by different combinations of the heterochromatic histone modifications H4K20me3, H3K9me2/3 and H3K27me3. Many DNA transposons are marked at the blastula stage already, whereas at retrotransposons the histone modifications generally accumulate at the gastrula stage or later. Furthermore, transposons marked by H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 are more prominent in gene deserts. Using intra-subfamily divergence as a proxy for age, we show that relatively young DNA transposons are preferentially marked by early embryonic H4K20me3 and H3K27me3. In contrast, relatively young retrotransposons are marked by increasing H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 during development, and are also linked to piRNA-sized small non-coding RNAs. Our results implicate distinct repression mechanisms that operate in a transposon-selective and developmental stage-specific fashion.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHistone CodeAnimalsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianEpigenetic RepressionEvolution, MolecularHeterochromatinHistonesMethylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRetroelementsRNA, Small InterferingXenopusDNA Transposable ElementsHeterochromatinHistonesRetroelementsRNA, Small InterferingXenopus ProteinsEvolutionH3K27me3H3K9me2/3H4K20me3piRNATransposons

Identifiers

PMID27639284
PMCPMC5350053
OpenAlexW2518794193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.