Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27639242›Full record

ReviewMedical mycology2017

Aspergillus vaccines: Hardly worth studying or worthy of hard study?

Stuart M Levitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical mycology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The Pathogenesis ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Fungal Cell Wall:Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. The antifungal pipeline: a reality check.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stuart M LevitzDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation Street, Room LRB317, Worcester, MA 01655, USA stuart.levitz@umassmed.edu.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Preclinical studies of a Cryptococcus vaccine for AIDS patientsR01AI125045 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEVITZ, STUART MICHAEL, LODGE, JENNIFER K. · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
ROLE OF MACROPHAGES IN CRYPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONSR01AI025780 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEVITZ, STUART MICHAEL · 1987 to 2019
$7.1M
Glucan Particles as a Vaccine Platform for Protective ImmunityR01AI102618 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEVITZ, STUART MICHAEL · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
Interactions of pDCs with AspergilusR01HL112671 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEVITZ, STUART MICHAEL · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112671NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI025780NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI102618NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines rank among the greatest advances in the history of public health. Yet, despite the need, there are no licensed vaccines to protect humans against fungal diseases, including aspergillosis. In this focused review, some of the major scientific and logistical challenges to developing vaccines to protect at-risk individuals against aspergillosis are discussed. Approaches that have shown promise in animal models include vaccines that protect against multiple fungal genera and those that are specifically directed to Aspergillus Advances in proteomics and glycomics have facilitated identification of candidate antigens for use in subunit vaccines. Novel adjuvants and delivery systems are becoming available that can skew vaccine responses toward those associated with protection. Immunotherapy consisting of adoptive transfer of Aspergillus-specific T cells to allogeneic hematopoietic transplant recipients has advanced to human testing but is technically difficult and of unproven benefit. While progress has been impressive, much work still needs to be done if vaccines against aspergillosis are to become a reality.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAspergillosisAspergillusClinical Trials as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFungal VaccinesHumansImmunization, PassiveVaccines, SubunitAdjuvants, ImmunologicFungal VaccinesVaccines, Subunitallergyallogeneic hematopoietic transplantaspergillosisfungal vaccinesimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27639242
PMCPMC5166590
OpenAlexW2521634197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.