ArticleBMC medicine2016
Predictive validity of the UKCAT for medical school undergraduate performance: a national prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the predictive validity of the UCAT-A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Medical teacher · 2022Pooled it
- Does the UKCAT predict performance in medical and dental school? A systematic review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Position paper on the existing selection procedure in Germany for the degree program human medicine - interim evaluation after four years. Position paper of the student selection (ASA) in the DACH Association for Medical Education (GMA).GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Do cognitively based medical selection assessment scores predict doctors' clinical competency? A protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- BMAT's predictive validity for medical school performance: A retrospective cohort study.Medical education · 2022Article
- Situational judgement test performance and subsequent misconduct in medical students.Medical education · 2022Article
- UCAT and dental student selection in the UK - what has changed?British dental journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Getting into medical school - an updated guide for dental graduates.British dental journal · 2020Article
- UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Opening the black box of selection.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2020Article
- A comparison of undergraduate outcomes for students from gateway courses and standard entry medicine courses.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Article
- Relationship between admission criteria and academic performance: A correlational study in nursing students.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Do changing medical admissions practices in the UK impact on who is admitted? An interrupted time series analysis.BMJ open · 2018Article
- What is the effect of secondary (high) schooling on subsequent medical school performance? A national, UK-based, cohort study.BMJ open · 2018Article
- The ability of 'non-cognitive' traits to predict undergraduate performance in medical schools: a national linkage study.BMC medical education · 2018Article
- Predictors of fitness to practise declarations in UK medical undergraduates.BMC medical education · 2018Article
- Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis.BMC medical education · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) has been shown to have a modest but statistically significant ability to predict aspects of academic performance throughout medical school. Previously, this ability has been shown to be incremental to conventional measures of educational performance for the first year of medical school. This study evaluates whether this predictive ability extends throughout the whole of undergraduate medical study and explores the potential impact of using the test as a selection screening tool.
methodsThis was an observational prospective study, linking UKCAT scores, prior educational attainment and sociodemographic variables with subsequent academic outcomes during the 5 years of UK medical undergraduate training. The participants were 6812 entrants to UK medical schools in 2007-8 using the UKCAT. The main outcome was academic performance at each year of medical school. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was also conducted, treating the UKCAT as a screening test for a negative academic outcome (failing at least 1 year at first attempt).
resultsAll four of the UKCAT scale scores significantly predicted performance in theory- and skills-based exams. After adjustment for prior educational achievement, the UKCAT scale scores remained significantly predictive for most years. Findings from the ROC analysis suggested that, if used as a sole screening test, with the mean applicant UKCAT score as the cut-off, the test could be used to reject candidates at high risk of failing at least 1 year at first attempt. However, the 'number needed to reject' value would be high (at 1.18), with roughly one candidate who would have been likely to pass all years at first sitting being rejected for every higher risk candidate potentially declined entry on this basis.
conclusionsThe UKCAT scores demonstrate a statistically significant but modest degree of incremental predictive validity throughout undergraduate training. Whilst the UKCAT could be considered a fairly crude screening tool for future academic performance, it may offer added value when used in conjunction with other selection measures. Future work should focus on the optimum role of such tests within the selection process and the prediction of post-graduate performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.