ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2016
[Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography : What is important in orthopedics and traumatology].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging for Dupuytren disease: a systematic review of the literature.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Pooled it
- The computed tomographybased anatomy of the ossa cuneiformia.Orthopedic reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are established complementary tools for cross-sectional imaging in addition to standard x‑rays in orthopedics and traumatology.
objectiveIllustration of possible applications of MRI and CT in acute and chronic joint diseases. MATERIAL AND
methodsSummary of the relevant literature with focus on the validity of MRI and CT in depicting joint trauma and pathologies. In addition, description of pitfalls in evaluation of the images.
resultsThe main focus of CT is the detailed visualization of fractures and deformities; however, MRI is the primary imaging technique for depiction of soft tissue pathologies, such as ligament tears and chondral lesions. Both imaging techniques are valuable in orthopedics and traumatology and complement each other in the development of treatment algorithms.
conclusionBoth MRI and CT are essential and complementing cross-sectional imaging techniques in the diagnostic procedures for joint pathologies in orthopedics and traumatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.