ReviewDer Pathologe2016
[Prognostic biomarkers for metastatic colorectal cancer].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Which patients are prone to suffer liver metastasis? A review of risk factors of metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.European journal of medical research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In colorectal cancer (CRC) distant metastases essentially determine the overall survival and prognosis. Biomarkers that correlate with the presence of distant metastases are therefore of great clinical importance for risk stratification and clinical treatment decisions. As part of the habilitation project various prognostic biomarkers were analyzed and correlated with the occurrence of distant metastases and different patterns of distant spread in CRC. It could be demonstrated that CRC with microsatellite instability (MSI), as detected by a loss of hMLH1 protein expression, have a very low risk of distant metastases. In contrast, microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC (with positive hMLH1 expression) with concurrent activation of the Wnt-beta catenin signaling pathway and strong expression of the cancer stem cell marker CD133, exhibit a very high risk for liver metastases. From these observations a two-step immunohistochemical algorithm based on three immunohistochemical stains could be derived, allowing CRC to be classified according to the risk of distant metastases. Further studies demonstrated that a deregulation of the Wnt-beta catenin signaling pathway and the expression of cancer stem cell markers, such as CD133 and CD44 correlated with hematogenous metastasis to the liver but not with peritoneal carcinomatosis or hematogenous metastasis to the central nervous system (CNS). Finally, in CRC patients with CNS metastases, increased rates of mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway (KRAS and BRAF mutations) in combination with a low beta catenin expression could be detected. It can be concluded from these results that for CRC with different patterns of distant spread alternative molecular mechanisms must play a role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.