Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27638421›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Inferring Past Effective Population Size from Distributions of Coalescent Times.

Lucie Gattepaille, Torsten Günther, Mattias Jakobsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unraveling the Complexity of theEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exact limits of inference in coalescent models.Theoretical population biology · 2019
    Article
  12. Hybridization and gene flow in the mega-pest lineage of moth,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucie GattepailleDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden lucie.gattepaille@ebc.uu.se mattias.jakobsson@ebc.uu.se.
Torsten GüntherDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
Mattias JakobssonDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden lucie.gattepaille@ebc.uu.se mattias.jakobsson@ebc.uu.se.
Uppsala University · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferring and understanding changes in effective population size over time is a major challenge for population genetics. Here we investigate some theoretical properties of random-mating populations with varying size over time. In particular, we present an exact solution to compute the population size as a function of time, [Formula: see text], based on distributions of coalescent times of samples of any size. This result reduces the problem of population size inference to a problem of estimating coalescent time distributions. To illustrate the analytic results, we design a heuristic method using a tree-inference algorithm and investigate simulated and empirical population-genetic data. We investigate the effects of a range of conditions associated with empirical data, for instance number of loci, sample size, mutation rate, and cryptic recombination. We show that our approach performs well with genomic data (≥ 10,000 loci) and that increasing the sample size from 2 to 10 greatly improves the inference of [Formula: see text] whereas further increase in sample size results in modest improvements, even under a scenario of exponential growth. We also investigate the impact of recombination and characterize the potential biases in inference of [Formula: see text] The approach can handle large sample sizes and the computations are fast. We apply our method to human genomes from four populations and reconstruct population size profiles that are coherent with previous finds, including the Out-of-Africa bottleneck. Additionally, we uncover a potential difference in population size between African and non-African populations as early as 400 KYA. In summary, we provide an analytic relationship between distributions of coalescent times and [Formula: see text], which can be incorporated into powerful approaches for inferring past population sizes from population-genomic data.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticAfricaBlack PeopleGenome, HumanHuman MigrationHumansRecombination, Geneticcoalescent timeeffective population sizehuman evolution

Identifiers

PMID27638421
PMCPMC5105851
OpenAlexW2520859288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.