Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27638391›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2016

Using reflection to influence practice: student perceptions of daily reflection in clinical education.

Douglas P Larsen, Daniel A London, Amanda R Emke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reflective Practice in Anesthesia Clinical Teaching.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pausing to reflect in a high-volume clinical milieu.Perspectives on medical education · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas P LarsenDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA. larsend@neuro.wustl.edu.
Daniel A LondonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, USA.
Amanda R EmkeDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReflection is a key element in learning from experience, but the impact of most programmes of reflection on daily practice remains unclear. We investigated students' perceptions of adding a daily written reflection assignment to a clinical rotation.

methodsThird-year medical students on a single two-week rotation completed daily reflections analyzing their performance. Programme evaluation used a 33-question anonymized survey. Quantitative data were summarized and qualitative responses coded for recurring themes.

resultsTwenty-six students completed the survey (90 % response rate). Eighty-five percent of students felt that the daily reflections had a positive impact on their learning from clinical experience. Seventy-seven percent of students reported that the programme changed their awareness of their thoughts and actions, and 80 % felt that it improved their recall of experiences. A greater sense of mindfulness and focus on self-improvement were major themes that emerge from students' descriptions of the role of daily reflections in their learning.

conclusionOverall, daily reflections demonstrated a positive learning influence. This exploratory study suggests students may benefit from more frequent, short reflections as opposed to more typically spaced reflective assignments.

Indexed as

Practice-based learningReflectionReflection-in-actionReflection-on-action

Identifiers

PMID27638391
PMCPMC5035279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.