ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2012
Early experience in robotic-assisted laparoscopic bilateral intravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux in children.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robot-Assisted Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation (REVUR) in Pediatric Patients: A New Standard of Treatment for Patients with VUR-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Narrative review: robotic pediatric surgery-current status and future perspectives.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: a valuable alternative to open surgery.World journal of urology · 2020Review
- Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- The Robot-Assisted Extravesical Anti-reflux Surgery: How We Overcame the Learning Curve.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- Lessons learned over a decade of pediatric robotic ureteral reimplantation.Investigative and clinical urology · 2017Review
- Robot-assisted Foley Tie Ureteric Tapering and Reimplantation.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A high success rate has been reported for laparoscopic intravesical ureteral reimplantation in the management of high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children. With the introduction of the da Vinci robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), robotic-assisted laparoscopic intravesical ureteral reimplantation may provide additional benefits, particularly in intravesical suturing. We present here our experience in three children, all with high-grade bilateral vesicoureteral reflux, who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic intravesical bilateral ureteral reimplantation. The procedure was successfully performed in all cases. There were no intra-operative or post-operative complications. Operative times were 430, 240 and 220 min. Hospital stay was 7, 6 and 2 days. Postoperative voiding cystourethrogram confirmed resolution of vesicoureteral refluxes in all cases and all three children were free from urinary tract infections on follow-up. Our initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic intravesical ureteral reimplantation has shown this to be a technically safe and feasible option in the management of children with bilateral high-grade vesicoureteric reflux.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.