Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27638249›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Pangenome and Phylogenomic Analysis of the Pathogenic Actinobacterium Rhodococcus equi.

Elisa Anastasi, Iain MacArthur, Mariela Scortti, Sonsiray Alvarez, Steeve Giguère, José A Vázquez-Boland

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phenotypical and molecular characterization of Rhodococcus equi isolated from foals in the Agreste region of Pernambuco - Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  4. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Complete genome sequence of the saprophytic actinomyceteMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  6. Genomic Diversity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. (Pan)genomic analysis of twoMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel Quantitative PCR forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Microbial genomics · 2021
    Article
  14. Epidemiology and Molecular Basis of Multidrug Resistance in Rhodococcus equi.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative Genomics of theMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  18. Conservation ofInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elisa AnastasiDivision of Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Iain MacArthurDivision of Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mariela ScorttiDivision of Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sonsiray AlvarezDivision of Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Steeve GiguèreDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, University of Georgia, Georgia, USA.
José A Vázquez-BolandDivision of Infection and Immunity, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom v.boland@ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004227/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a comparative study of 29 representative genomes of the animal pathogen Rhodococcus equi The analyses showed that R. equi is genetically homogeneous and clonal, with a large core genome accounting for ≈80% of an isolates' gene content. An open pangenome, even distribution of accessory genes among the isolates, and absence of significant core-genome recombination, indicated that gene gain/loss is a main driver of R. equi genome evolution. Traits previously predicted to be important in R. equi physiology, virulence and niche adaptation were part of the core genome. This included the lack of a phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate transport system (PTS), unique among the rhodococci except for the closely related Rhodococcus defluvii, reflecting selective PTS gene loss in the R. equi-R. defluvii sublineage. Thought to be asaccharolytic, rbsCB and glcP non-PTS sugar permease homologues were identified in the core genome and, albeit inefficiently, R. equi utilized their putative substrates, ribose and (irregularly) glucose. There was no correlation between R. equi whole-genome phylogeny and host or geographical source, with evidence of global spread of genomovars. The distribution of host-associated virulence plasmid types was consistent with the exchange of the plasmids (and corresponding host shifts) across the R. equi population, and human infection being zoonotically acquired. Phylogenomic analyses demonstrated that R. equi occupies a central position in the Rhodococcus phylogeny, not supporting the recently proposed transfer of the species to a new genus.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialPhylogenyBacterial ProteinsCarbohydrate MetabolismMembrane Transport ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticRhodococcus equiBacterial ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsActinobacteriacomparative genomicsCorynebacterialesgenome diversity and evolutionpangenome analysisphylogenomicsRhodococcus equi

Identifiers

PMID27638249
PMCPMC5174736
OpenAlexW2519988391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.