Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27638133›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2016

Management of neutropenic patients in the intensive care unit (NEWBORNS EXCLUDED) recommendations from an expert panel from the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) with the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care Emergencies (GFRUP), the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR), the French Society of Hematology (SFH), the French Society for Hospital Hygiene (SF2H), and the French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF).

David Schnell, Elie Azoulay, Dominique Benoit, Benjamin Clouzeau, Pierre Demaret, Stéphane Ducassou, Pierre Frange, Matthieu Lafaurie, Matthieu Legrand, Anne-Pascale Meert and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03217721 (Antibiotics Management of Septic Neutropenic Patients in the Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03217721 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Antibiotics Management of Septic Neutropenic Patients in the Intensive Care Unit : New Recommendations do They Change Our Clinical Practice ?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BrestRan2017 to 2017Enrolled130ConditionsNeutropenia, Febrile
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

David SchnellAngouleme Hospital, Angoulême, France.
Elie AzoulaySaint-Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Dominique BenoitIntensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Benjamin ClouzeauMedical Intensive Care Unit, Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Pierre DemaretPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Chrétien, Liège, Belgium.
Stéphane DucassouPediatric Hematological Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Pierre FrangeMicrobiology Laboratory & Pediatric Immunology - Hematology Unit, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France.
Matthieu LafaurieDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Saint-Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Matthieu LegrandSurgical ICU and Burn Unit, Saint-Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Anne-Pascale MeertThoracic Oncology Department and Oncologic Intensive Care Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
Djamel MokartPolyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille, France.
Jérôme NaudinPediatric ICU, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France.
Frédéric PeneCochin University Hospital Hospital, Paris, France.
Antoine RabbatRespiratory Intensive Care Unit, Cochin University Hospital Hospital, Paris, France.
Emmanuel RaffouxDepartment of Hematology, Saint-Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Patricia RibaudDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, Saint-Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Jean-Christophe RichardCroix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France.
François VincentMontfermeil Hospital, Montfermeil, France.
Jean-Ralph ZaharInfection Control Unit, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Michael DarmonUniversity Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France. michael.darmon@chu-st-etienne.fr.
Hôpital Saint-Louis · FRHôpital Cochin · FRCentre Hospitalier Chrétien · BECentre Hospitalier d'Angoulême · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRGhent University Hospital · BEGroupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy Montfermeil · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInstitut Jules Bordet · BEInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRUniversité d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutropenia is defined by either an absolute or functional defect (acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome) of polymorphonuclear neutrophils and is associated with high risk of specific complications that may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Specificities in the management of critically ill neutropenic patients prompted the establishment of guidelines dedicated to intensivists. These recommendations were drawn up by a panel of experts brought together by the French Intensive Care Society in collaboration with the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care Emergencies, the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, the French Society of Hematology, the French Society for Hospital Hygiene, and the French Infectious Diseases Society. Literature review and formulation of recommendations were performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Each recommendation was then evaluated and rated by each expert using a methodology derived from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Six fields are covered by the provided recommendations: (1) ICU admission and prognosis, (2) protective isolation and prophylaxis, (3) management of acute respiratory failure, (4) organ failure and organ support, (5) antibiotic management and source control, and (6) hematological management. Most of the provided recommendations are obtained from low levels of evidence, however, suggesting a need for additional studies. Seven recommendations were, however, associated with high level of evidences and are related to protective isolation, diagnostic workup of acute respiratory failure, medical management, and timing surgery in patients with typhlitis.

Indexed as

AntibioticsGuidelinesIntensive care unitsIsolationNeutropeniaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27638133
PMCPMC5025409
OpenAlexW2518864633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.