ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017
High frequency of occupied attB regions in Norwegian Staphylococcus aureus isolates supports a two-step MRSA screening algorithm.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome Sequencing of a Historic Staphylococcus aureus Collection Reveals New Enterotoxin Genes and Sheds Light on the Evolution and Genomic Organization of This Key Virulence Gene Family.Journal of bacteriology · 2021Article
- Performance of the Hologic Panther Fusion® MRSA Assay for the nasal screening of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020Article
- Updating Molecular Diagnostics for Detecting Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Blood Culture Bottles.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid nucleic acid amplification tests for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) diagnostics commonly target the mec resistance gene, genes specific for S. aureus, and the integration site for the SCCmec resistance cassette, orfX. Due to poor specificity when these target genes are used individually, additional culture is required to verify positive results. The combination of these targets is useful, but the optimal algorithm may depend on the presence of the genetic markers in S. aureus isolates, as well as the prevalence of MRSA in a population. The aim of the present study was to identify a rapid, low-cost, and functional screening algorithm in order to reduce the response time for MRSA diagnostics. An in-house orfX-SCCmec polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was established and evaluated. The results were compared with an existing mec/nuc PCR assay and traditional culture. Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) that tested false-positive in the orfX-SCCmec PCR assay were further investigated with full genome sequencing using the Ion PGM™ System to verify results and causality. Based on these data, a two-step screening algorithm with initial mec/nuc PCR followed by orfX-SCCmec PCR on positive samples was suggested and tested on 1443 patient samples. 22.5 % of MSSA isolates tested false-positive with the orfX-SCCmec PCR. Full genome sequencing of these isolates identified genetic variation in the attB region of S. aureus, including empty cassette variants and non-mec SCC. The suggested two-step MRSA screening algorithm allowed us to report MRSA results for 95.6 % of all samples and 99 % of MRSA-negative samples after one day.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27638009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.