Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27637902›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Improvement of sensory function after sequestrectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective clinical study using quantitative sensory testing.

Anja Tschugg, Sara Lener, Sebastian Hartmann, Sabrina Neururer, Matthias Wildauer, Claudius Thomé, Wolfgang N Löscher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anja TschuggDepartment of Neurosurgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. anja.tschugg@i-med.ac.at.
Sara LenerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sebastian HartmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sabrina NeururerDepartment of Medical Statistics and Health Economics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Matthias WildauerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Claudius ThoméDepartment of Neurosurgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wolfgang N LöscherDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have investigated sensory recovery in patients with lumbar disc herniation using rather subjective methods. There have been no reports on changes of sensory function in patients suffering from a preoperative sensory deficit using quantitative sensory testing (QST). The aims of this prospective study were (1) to assess the recovery of preoperative sensory dysfunction after lumbar sequestrectomy and (2) to quantify the strength of relationship between a sensory deficit and the patient's quality of life.

methodsWe applied the QST protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) in fifty-two patients with a single lumbar disc herniation confirmed on MRI treated by lumbar sequestrectomy. Further evaluation included a detailed medical history, a physical examination, numeric rating scale for leg, EQ-5D questionnaire, and thermometer.

resultsDisc surgery resulted in a significant reduction of leg pain and a significant gain of quality of life. Thermal, mechanical, and vibration perception thresholds showed an obvious side-to-side difference preoperatively (p < 0.005). An early recovery of mechanical and vibration perception thresholds was detected, whereas cold perception needed more than 6 months to recover (p < 0.05). Quality of life was independent from perception thresholds, but correlated significantly with pain reduction.

conclusionOur data clearly show that there is a subjective and quantifiable improvement in sensory dysfunction postoperatively. The current data suggest that a sensory dysfunction does not influence a patient's quality of life.

Indexed as

Neurologic ExaminationSensory ThresholdsAdultFemaleHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSensation DisordersLumbar disc herniationLumbar radiculopathyLumbar sequestrectomyQuantitative sensory testingSensory deficit

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.