ArticleCytotherapy2016
Mesenchymal stromal cell injection promotes vocal fold scar repair without long-term engraftment.
Article in Cytotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety of Locally Delivered Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Promoting Corneal Repair
Efficacy of Locally Delivered Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Promoting Corneal Repair
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regenerative therapies for femoral head necrosis in the past two decades: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Regenerative Strategies for Vocal Fold Repair Using Injectable Materials.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Novel application of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells combined with hepatocyte growth factor on subacute vocal fold wound healing.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal stromal cell-laden hydrogels in tissue regeneration: insights from preclinical and clinical research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Viral airway injury promotes cell engraftment in an in vitro model of cystic fibrosis cell therapy.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024Article
- Vocal fold restoration after scarring: biocompatibility and efficacy of an MSC-based bioequivalent.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Article
- Stem cell therapy for vocal fold regeneration after scarring: a review of experimental approaches.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Review
- Progress in Vocal Fold Regenerative Biomaterials: An Immunological Perspective.Advanced nanobiomed research · 2022Article
- Achievements and Challenges in Transplantation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Otorhinolaryngology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Biocompatibility and Viscoelastic Properties of Injectable Resilin-Like Polypeptide and Hyaluronan Hybrid Hydrogels in Rabbit Vocal Folds.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2019Article
- Paired versus two-group experimental design for rheological studies of vocal fold tissues.Journal of biomechanics · 2019Article
- Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Persist in Tissue-Engineered Vocal Fold Replacement in Rabbits.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRegenerative medicine holds promise for restoring voice in patients with vocal fold scarring. As experimental treatments approach clinical translation, several considerations remain. Our objective was to evaluate efficacy and biocompatibility of four bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell (BM-MSC) and tunable hyaluronic acid based hydrogel (HyStem-VF) treatments for vocal fold scar using clinically acceptable materials, a preclinical sample size and a dosing comparison.
methodsVocal folds of 84 rabbits were injured and injected with four treatment variations (BM-MSC, HyStem-VF, and BM-MSC in HyStem-VF at two concentrations) 6 weeks later. Efficacy was assessed with rheometry, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and histology at 2, 4 and 10 weeks following treatment. Lung, liver, kidney, spleen and vocal folds were screened for biocompatibility by a pathologist. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Persistent inflammation was identified in all hydrogel-injected groups. The BM-MSC alone treatment appeared to be the most efficacious and safe, providing an early resolution of viscoelasticity, gene expression consistent with desirable extracellular matrix remodeling (less fibronectin, collagen 1α2, collagen 3, procollagen, transforming growth factor [TGF]β1, alpha smooth muscle actin, interleukin-1β, interleukin-17β and tumor necrosis factor [TNF] than injured controls) and minimal inflammation. Human beta actin expression in BM-MSC-treated vocal folds was minimal after 2 weeks, suggesting that paracrine signaling from the BM-MSCs may have facilitated tissue repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.