Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27637576›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2017

Younger Elementary School Students Waste More School Lunch Foods than Older Elementary School Students.

Shahrbanou F Niaki, Carolyn E Moore, Tzu-An Chen, Karen Weber Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Food Trying and Liking Related to Grade Level and Meal Participation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shahrbanou F Niaki
Carolyn E Moore
Tzu-An Chen
Karen Weber Cullen

Funding

Revised Federal School Meal Guidelines: Impact on Student Food Intake and CostsR01HD068349 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CULLEN, KAREN WEBER · 2011 to 2012
$932k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren may not receive nutritional benefits from school lunch meals if they do not eat the foods served.

objectiveThis study investigated whether there were differences in school lunch foods consumed and wasted by grade level of elementary school students.

designIn this cross-sectional study, anonymous meal observations were conducted after students selected their reimbursable school lunch meals in the cafeteria lunch line. The amounts of foods selected and consumed were recorded using the quarter waste method and food waste was calculated using the information recorded. PARTICIPANTS/

settingDuring the spring of 2013, eight elementary schools (50% low income) enrolling children in kindergarten through grade 5 in one school district in the Houston, TX, area were selected by the Child Nutrition Director.

main outcome measuresThe amount of calories and foods consumed and the percentage wasted were assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Analysis of covariance and post hoc analysis were used to examine food consumption and plate waste by grade level (kindergarten and grade 1 [K-Gr1], grades 2 and 3 [Gr2-3], and grades 4 and 5 [Gr4-5]), controlling for student sex and school-level free/reduced priced meal eligibility.

resultsThere were 568 nonrandom lunch meal observations of students included in the analyses. Approximately 48% of the observations were from boys; 50% were from low-income schools, and were evenly divided by grade. In general, students in K-Gr1 consumed fewer calories than both Gr2-3 and Gr4-5, and Gr2-3 students consumed significantly fewer calories than Gr4-5. K-Gr1 students also consumed less and wasted more total and red-orange vegetables, total/whole/refined grains, and total protein foods than the older students. Gr2-3 students wasted more calories and total grains than Gr4-5 students. K-Gr1 students wasted more fruit than Gr2-3 students.

conclusionsOverall, younger students in elementary schools (K-Gr-1) consumed less of the foods they selected for their lunch meals, and wasted more than older elementary school students. Future studies should investigate why younger children wasted more food and potential strategies to reduce food waste by younger students.

Indexed as

Age FactorsLunchStudentsChildChild, PreschoolChoice BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDietDiet, HealthyEnergy IntakeFemaleFood PreferencesFood ServicesFruitHumansMaleElementary schoolsGrade levelsNational School Lunch ProgramPlate waste

Identifiers

PMID27637576
PMCPMC5183504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.