Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27637361›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2016

Tracking Dabbing Using Search Query Surveillance: A Case Study in the United States.

Zhu Zhang, Xiaolong Zheng, Daniel Dajun Zeng, Scott J Leischow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  9. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Twitter-based survey on marijuana concentrate use.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhu ZhangDepartment of Management Information Systems, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0635-8260
Daniel Dajun ZengORCID 0000-0002-9046-222X

Funding

Understanding E-Cigarette Adoption and Marketing: A Social Media StudyR01DA037378 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI LEISCHOW, SCOTT J, ZHANG, BIN · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDabbing is an emerging method of marijuana ingestion. However, little is known about dabbing owing to limited surveillance data on dabbing.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to analyze Google search data to assess the scope and breadth of information seeking on dabbing.

methodsGoogle Trends data about dabbing and related topics (eg, electronic nicotine delivery system [ENDS], also known as e-cigarettes) in the United States between January 2004 and December 2015 were collected by using relevant search terms such as "dab rig." The correlation between dabbing (including topics: dab and hash oil) and ENDS (including topics: vaping and e-cigarette) searches, the regional distribution of dabbing searches, and the impact of cannabis legalization policies on geographical location in 2015 were analyzed.

resultsSearches regarding dabbing increased in the United States over time, with 1,526,280 estimated searches during 2015. Searches for dab and vaping have very similar temporal patterns, where the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) is .992 (P<.001). Similar phenomena were also obtained in searches for hash oil and e-cigarette, in which the corresponding PCC is .931 (P<.001). Dabbing information was searched more in some western states than other regions. The average dabbing searches were significantly higher in the states with medical and recreational marijuana legalization than in the states with only medical marijuana legalization (P=.02) or the states without medical and recreational marijuana legalization (P=.01).

conclusionsPublic interest in dabbing is increasing in the United States. There are close associations between dabbing and ENDS searches. The findings suggest greater popularity of dabs in the states that legalized medical and recreational marijuana use. This study proposes a novel and timely way of cannabis surveillance, and these findings can help enhance the understanding of the popularity of dabbing and provide insights for future research and informed policy making on dabbing.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorInternetHumansMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingSpatial AnalysisUnited Statesinformation seeking behaviormarijuanasearch enginespatial analysissurveillancetime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID27637361
PMCPMC5045525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.