ArticlePractical radiation oncology
Gemcitabine-induced radiation recall myositis in a patient with relapsed nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Practical radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and pathological aspects of toxic myopathies.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Paraspinal radiation recall myositis after gemcitabine for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.BMJ case reports · 2021Review
- Prevalence of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Patients with Dermatomyositis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2021Review
- Report of a unique case of gemcitabine-induced radiation recall myelitis following spinal cord irradiation.BJR case reports · 2020Article
- Pectoralis major radiation recall.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2019Article
- Gemcitabine-Induced Radiation Recall Myositis: Case Report and Review of the Literature.Case reports in oncologyArticle
- A Case of Radiation Recall Myositis and Neuropathy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.