Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27636884›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Repeated Treatments with Ingenol Mebutate Prevents Progression of UV-Induced Photodamage in Hairless Mice.

Andrés Már Erlendsson, Daniel Thaysen-Petersen, Christiane Bay, Andreas Hald, Kresten Skak, John Robert Zibert, Uwe Paasch, Hans Christian Wulf, Merete Haedersdal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Construction of a Secondary Enclosure for UVB Irradiation of Mice.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrés Már ErlendssonDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3171-4458
Daniel Thaysen-PetersenDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christiane BayDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas HaldLeo Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark.
Kresten SkakLeo Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark.
John Robert ZibertLeo Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark.
Uwe PaaschDepartment of Dermatology, Division of Aesthetics and Laserdermatology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Hans Christian WulfDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Merete HaedersdalDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKLeo Pharma (Denmark) · DKLeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimIngenol mebutate (IngMeb) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis. In this study, we hypothesized that repeated treatments with IngMeb may prevent progression of UV-induced photodamage, and that concurrent application of a corticosteroid may reduce IngMeb-induced local skin responses (LSR).

methodsHairless mice (n = 60; 3 groups of 20 mice) were irradiated with solar simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) throughout the study. Five single treatments with IngMeb were given at 4-week intervals (Days 21, 49, 77, 105, and 133). Clobetasol propionate (CP) was applied once daily for 5 days prior to each IngMeb application, as well as 6 h and 1 day post treatment. One week after IngMeb treatment No. 1, 3, and 5 (Days 28, 84, and 140), biopsies from four mice in each group were collected for histological evaluation of UV-damage on a standardized UV-damage scale (0-12). LSR (0-24) were assessed once daily (Days 1-7) after each IngMeb treatment.

resultsIngMeb prevented progression of photodamage in terms of keratosis grade, epidermal hypertrophy, dysplasia, and dermal actinic damage with a lower composite UV-damage score on day 140 (UVR 10.25 vs. UVR+IngMeb 6.00, p = 0.002) compared to UVR alone. IngMeb induced LSR, including erythema, flaking, crusting, bleeding, vesiculation, and ulceration. Concurrent CP increased LSR (max LSR Tx 1-5: UVR+IngMeb+CP 3.6-5.5 vs. UVR+IngMeb 2.6-4.3) and provided better prevention of photodamage compared to IngMeb alone (Day 140: UVR+IngMeb 6.00 vs. UVR+IngMeb+CP 3.00 p < 0.001).

conclusionRepeated field-directed treatments with IngMeb prevent progression of cutaneous photodamage in hairless mice, while CP cannot be used to alleviate IngMeb-induced LSR. The findings suggest that IngMeb may potentially serve as a prophylactic treatment for UV-induced tumors.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAnimalsClobetasolDisease ProgressionDiterpenesFemaleKeratosis, ActinicMice, Hairless3-ingenyl angelateClobetasolDiterpenes

Identifiers

PMID27636884
PMCPMC5026374
OpenAlexW2519370175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.