Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27636722›Full record

Trial reportThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2017

Safety, Efficacy, and Exposure-Response of Voriconazole in Pediatric Patients With Invasive Aspergillosis, Invasive Candidiasis or Esophageal Candidiasis.

Judith M Martin, Mercedes Macias-Parra, Peter Mudry, Umberto Conte, Jean L Yan, Ping Liu, M Rita Capparella, Jalal A Aram

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Resolution of esophageal dysmotility following treatment of nasal disease in a dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Judith M MartinFrom the *Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; †Pediatric Infectious Diseases Department, Instituto Nacional de Pediatria, Mexico City, Mexico; ‡Department of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic; §Antifungal Clinical Development, Pfizer Inc., New York, New York; ¶Global Established Pharma-Biostatistics, Pfizer Inc., New York, New York; ‖Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut; **Global Established Pharma, Pfizer PFE, Paris, France; and ††Global Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut.
Mercedes Macias-Parra
Peter Mudry
Umberto Conte
Jean L Yan
Ping Liu
M Rita Capparella
Jalal A Aram
University Hospital Brno · CZPfizer (United States) · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USInstituto Nacional de Pediatria · MXPfizer (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on safety and efficacy of voriconazole for invasive aspergillosis (IA) and invasive candidiasis/esophageal candidiasis (IC/EC) in pediatric patients are limited.

methodsPatients aged 2-<18 years with IA and IC/EC were enrolled in 2 prospective open-label, non-comparative studies of voriconazole. Patients followed dosing regimens based on age, weight and indication, with adjustments permitted. Treatment duration was 6-12 weeks for IA patients, ≥14 days after last positive Candida culture for IC patients and ≥7 days after signs/symptoms resolution for EC patients. Primary analysis for both the studies was safety and tolerability of voriconazole. Secondary end points included global response success at week 6 and end of treatment (EOT), all-causality mortality and time to death. Voriconazole exposure-response relationship was explored.

resultsOf 53 voriconazole-treated pediatric patients (31 IA; 22 IC/EC), 14 had proven/probable IA, 7 had confirmed IC and 10 had confirmed EC. Treatment-related hepatic and visual adverse events, respectively, were reported in 22.6% and 16.1% of IA patients, and 22.7% and 27.3% of IC/EC patients. All-causality mortality in IA patients was 14.3% at week 6; no deaths were attributed to voriconazole. No deaths were reported for IC/EC patients. Global response success rate was 64.3% (week 6 and EOT) in IA patients and 76.5% (EOT) in IC/EC patients. There was no association between voriconazole exposure and efficacy; however, a slight positive association between voriconazole exposure and hepatic adverse events was established.

conclusionsSafety and efficacy outcomes in pediatric patients with IA and IC/EC were consistent with previous findings in adult patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisCandidiasisCandidiasis, InvasiveChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID27636722
PMCPMC5345593
OpenAlexW2520854936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.