ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2017
A method for safely resecting anterior butterfly gliomas: the surgical anatomy of the default mode network and the relevance of its preservation.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- An update on tests used for intraoperative monitoring of cognition during awake craniotomy.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Pooled it
- Microsurgical resection of gliomas of the cingulate gyrus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2023Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of overall survival and postoperative neurologic deficits after resection or biopsy of butterfly glioblastoma.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Parcellation-based tractographic modeling of the salience network through meta-analysis.Brain and behavior · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review of the use of subcortical intraoperative electrical stimulation mapping for monitoring of executive deficits and neglect: what is the evidence so far?Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of surgical resection of butterfly glioblastoma on survival: a meta-analysis based on comparative studies.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Butterfly gliomas: to biopsy or to ablate - a longitudinal cohort study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Multimodal techniques for maximal safe resection of IDH-mutant low-grade glioma involving corpus callosum, a retrospective study and prognosis analysis.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- Surgical decision making in the era of supramarginal glioma resections: a current perspective and narrative review.CNS oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Applying the en-bloc technique in corpus callosum glioblastoma surgery contributes to maximal resection and better prognosis: a retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- The Brain Connectome for Clinical Neuroscience.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Large-scale brain networks and intra-axial tumor surgery: a narrative review of functional mapping techniques, critical needs, and scientific opportunities.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Depicting the anatomy of the gyral white matter:Brain communications · 2023Review
- Review of Intraoperative Adjuncts for Maximal Safe Resection of Gliomas and Its Impact on Outcomes.Cancers · 2022Review
- Prognostic differences and implications on treatment strategies between butterfly glioblastoma and glioblastoma with unilateral corpus callosum infiltration.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Should Neurosurgeons Try to Preserve Non-Traditional Brain Networks? A Systematic Review of the Neuroscientific Evidence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Anatomy and white-matter connections of the precuneus.Brain imaging and behavior · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gliomas invading the anterior corpus callosum are commonly deemed unresectable due to an unacceptable risk/benefit ratio, including the risk of abulia. In this study, the authors investigated the anatomy of the cingulum and its connectivity within the default mode network (DMN). A technique is described involving awake subcortical mapping with higher attention tasks to preserve the cingulum and reduce the incidence of postoperative abulia for patients with so-called butterfly gliomas. METHODS The authors reviewed clinical data on all patients undergoing glioma surgery performed by the senior author during a 4-year period at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. Forty patients were identified who underwent surgery for butterfly gliomas. Each patient was designated as having undergone surgery either with or without the use of awake subcortical mapping and preservation of the cingulum. Data recorded on these patients included the incidence of abulia/akinetic mutism. In the context of the study findings, the authors conducted a detailed anatomical study of the cingulum and its role within the DMN using postmortem fiber tract dissections of 10 cerebral hemispheres and in vivo diffusion tractography of 10 healthy subjects. RESULTS Forty patients with butterfly gliomas were treated, 25 (62%) with standard surgical methods and 15 (38%) with awake subcortical mapping and preservation of the cingulum. One patient (1/15, 7%) experienced postoperative abulia following surgery with the cingulum-sparing technique. Greater than 90% resection was achieved in 13/15 (87%) of these patients. CONCLUSIONS This study presents evidence that anterior butterfly gliomas can be safely removed using a novel, attention-task based, awake brain surgery technique that focuses on preserving the anatomical connectivity of the cingulum and relevant aspects of the cingulate gyrus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.