Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27636126›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

Use of Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging (SWI) in the Detection of Brain Hemorrhagic Metastases from Breast Cancer and Melanoma.

Ana Marija Franceschi, Stergios J Moschos, Carey K Anders, Samuel Glaubiger, Frances A Collichio, Carrie B Lee, Mauricio Castillo, Yueh Z Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Brain metastases: neuroimaging.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Marija FranceschiFrom the *Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; and †Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UNC at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; ‡Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Stergios J Moschos
Carey K Anders
Samuel Glaubiger
Frances A Collichio
Carrie B Lee
Mauricio Castillo
Yueh Z Lee
New York University · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
PARP Inhibition to Treat Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Brain MetastasesK23CA157728 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ANDERS, CAREY KERNODLE · 2011 to 2015
$867k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA157728NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSusceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) has significantly increased our sensitivity in detecting hemorrhagic brain lesions. We sought to explore the prevalence of intratumoral hemorrhage as detected by SWI in brain metastases from melanoma and breast cancer.

methodsLesions with a size of 0.1 cm were categorized as micrometastases, whereas larger lesions were categorized as macrometastases. Susceptibility-weighted imaging findings on locations corresponding to enhancing lesions were categorized as either positive or negative based on presence/absence of signal dropout. The percentage of SWI positivity was then estimated as a function of lesion size. Two-tailed Fisher exact test was performed to examine differences in the contingency tables.

resultsMagnetic resonance imaging studies from 73 patients with 1173 brain metastases, which enhanced on postcontrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) were selected for analysis. Of these lesions, 952 had SWI data available, and 342 of 952 were micrometastases. Only 10 of the 342 micrometastases and 410 (67.2%) of the 610 macrometastases were SWI positive (P < 0.0001). When examined by tumor type, 76.9% (melanoma) versus 55.6% (breast cancer) were SWI positive (P < 0.0001), regardless of tumor size. All melanoma lesions (8/8) and only 1 of 15 breast cancer lesions larger than 1.5 cm were SWI positive.

conclusionWith the use of combined SWI and contrast-enhanced high-resolution T1 imaging, we found that presence of intratumoral brain hemorrhage is uncommon in micrometastases but common in metastases greater than 0.1 cm from breast cancer or melanoma. Large metastases commonly harbored hemorrhage, and this occurred more frequently in patients with melanoma than with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCerebral HemorrhageDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMelanomaReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID27636126
PMCPMC5027959
OpenAlexW2470641680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.