ReviewOmics : a journal of integrative biology2016
Toward a Global Roadmap for Precision Medicine in Psychiatry: Challenges and Opportunities.
Review in Omics : a journal of integrative biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing health economics for pharmacogenomics research translation in Africa.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- Attitudes towards a multimodal precision medicine algorithm for predicting treatment response in depression: findings from a large cross-sectional European survey.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Modeling factors critical for implementation of precision medicine at health systems-level: an IRT approach.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Precision Psychiatry Applications with Pharmacogenomics: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Four Actionable Bottlenecks and Potential Solutions to Translating Psychiatric Genetics Research: An Expert Review.Public health genomics · 2020Review
- Relationships between cerebrospinal fluid GABAergic neurosteroid levels and symptom severity in men with PTSD.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2019Article
- Metabolomics Biomarkers for Precision Psychiatry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental disorders represent a major public health burden worldwide. This is likely to rise in the next decade, with the highest increases predicted to occur in low- and middle-income countries. Current psychotropic medication treatment guidelines focus on uniform approaches to the treatment of heterogeneous disorders and achieve only partial therapeutic success. Developing a global precision medicine approach in psychiatry appears attractive, given the value of this approach in other fields of medicine, such as oncology and infectious diseases. In this horizon scanning analysis, we review the salient opportunities and challenges for precision medicine in psychiatry over the next decade. Variants within numerous genes involved in a range of pathways have been implicated in psychotropic drug response and might ultimately be used to guide choice of pharmacotherapy. Multipronged approaches such as multi-omics (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics) analyses and systems diagnostics together with high-throughput sequencing and genotyping technologies hold promise for identifying precise and targeted treatments in mental disorders. To date, however, the vast majority of pharmacogenomics work has been undertaken in high-income countries on a relatively small proportion of the global population, and many other challenges face the field. Opportunities and challenges for establishing a global roadmap for precision medicine in psychiatry are discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.