ArticleRadiology2016
Coronary CT Angiography: Variability of CT Scanners and Readers in Measurement of Plaque Volume.
Article in Radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06029387 (Artificial Intelligence for Preventing Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Artificial Intelligence for Preventing Heart Disease: Observational, Single Center, Prospective and Retrospective Study
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Standards for quantitative assessments by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA): An expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT).Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyGuideline
- High scan-rescan repeatability of AI-enabled coronary plaque quantification from coronary CT angiography.European radiology · 2026Article
- Coronary plaque quantification on energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT: reproducibility and power modeling for mixed-platform trials.European radiology · 2026Article
- Mitigating CT number variability between scanners, tube potentials, and patient sizes using spectral CT virtual monoenergetic imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography and Artificial Intelligence-based Plaque Analysis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Effects of high- versus low-intensity lipid-lowering treatment in patients undergoing serial coronary computed tomography angiography: results of the multi-center LOCATE study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Impact of technical, patient-related and measurement variables on serial Hounsfield unit-based quantitative coronary plaque analysis in computed tomography: time for a new chapter.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Review
- Use of AI in Cardiac CT and MRI: A Scientific Statement from the ESCR, EuSoMII, NASCI, SCCT, SCMR, SIIM, and RSNA.Radiology · 2025Review
- Coronary CT angiography: First comparison of model-based and hybrid iterative reconstruction with the reference standard invasive catheter angiography for CAD-RADS reporting.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- The Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography in Risk Stratification for Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- Evaluation of four computed tomography reconstruction algorithms using a coronary artery phantom.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Motion artifact correction in cardiac CT using cross-phase temporospatial information and synergistic attention gate and spatial transformer sub-networks.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Comparison of Two Contemporary Quantitative Atherosclerotic Plaque Assessment Tools for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Single-Center Analysis and Multi-Center Patient Cohort Validation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Computed tomographic angiography measures of coronary plaque in clinical trials:Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Longitudinal association of epicardial and thoracic adipose tissues with coronary and cardiac characteristics in psoriasis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Cholesterol efflux capacity is associated with lipoprotein size and vascular health in mild to moderate psoriasis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- CAD-RADS may underestimate coronary plaque progression as detected by serial CT angiography.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2022Article
- Utilizing (serial) coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to predict plaque progression and major adverse cardiac events (MACE): results, merits and challenges.European radiology · 2022Review
- Radiation dose reduction with deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography.European radiology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To determine reader and computed tomography (CT) scan variability for measurement of coronary plaque volume. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant study followed Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy guidelines. Baseline coronary CT angiography was performed in 40 prospectively enrolled subjects (mean age, 67 years ± 6 [standard deviation]) with asymptomatic hyperlipidemia by using a 320-detector row scanner (Aquilion One Vision; Toshiba, Otawara, Japan). Twenty of these subjects underwent coronary CT angiography repeated on a separate day with the same CT scanner (Toshiba, group 1); 20 subjects underwent repeat CT performed with a different CT scanner (Somatom Force; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany [group 2]). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess interreader, intrareader, and interstudy reproducibility. Results Baseline and repeat coronary CT angiography scans were acquired within 19 days ± 6. Interreader and intrareader agreement rates were high for total, calcified, and noncalcified plaques for both CT scanners (all ICCs ≥ 0.96) without bias. Scanner variability was ±18.4% (coefficient of variation) with same-vendor follow-up. However, scanner variability increased to ±29.9% with different-vendor follow-up. The sample size to detect a 5% change in noncalcified plaque volume with 90% power and an α error of .05 was 286 subjects for same-CT scanner follow-up and 753 subjects with different-vendor follow-up. Conclusion State-of-the-art coronary CT angiography with same-vendor follow-up has good scan-rescan reproducibility, suggesting a role of coronary CT angiography in monitoring coronary artery plaque response to therapy. Differences between coronary CT angiography vendors resulted in lower scan-rescan reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.